Assessment of the efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in patients over 80 years old with giant cell arteritis

• Published in: Arthritis research & therapy Vol. 23; no. 1
• Main Authors: de Boysson, Hubert, Le Besnerais, Maelle, Blaison, Félix, Daumas, Aurélie, Jarrot, Pierre-André, Perrin, François, Tieulié, Nathalie, Maria, Alexandre, Duffau, Pierre, Gombert, Bruno, Samson, Maxime, Espitia, Olivier, Lambert, Marc, Mékinian, Arsène, Aouba, Achille
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: BMC 19.05.2021
• Subjects: Life Sciences
• ISSN: 1478-6362
• DOI: 10.1186/s13075-021-02529-4

Abstract Objective To assess the efficacy and tolerance of tocilizumab (TCZ) in giant cell arteritis (GCA) patients over 80. Method GCA patients over 80 years old from the French Study Group for Large Vessel Vasculitis register who received TCZ were analyzed. Results Twenty-one GCA patients (median age 84 [81–90] years old, including nine over 85) received TCZ for the following nonexclusive reasons: glucocorticoid (GC)-sparing effect in 14, relapsing disease in 8, disease severity in 4, and/or failure of another immunosuppressant in 4. TCZ was introduced with GCs at diagnosis in 6 patients and at 8 [3–37] months after GC initiation in 15 others. After a median delay of 8 [2–21] months post-TCZ introduction, 14 (67%) patients were able to definitively stop GCs, including 6 who were GC-dependent before TCZ. At the last follow-up (median 20 [3–48] months), 11 (52%) patients had definitively stopped TCZ, and 2 additional patients had stopped but relapsed and resumed TCZ. Seven (33%) patients experienced 11 adverse events: hypercholesterolemia in 4 patients; infections, i.e., pyelonephritis, bronchitis, and fatal septic shock associated with mesenteric infarction following planned surgery (GCs were stopped for 1 year and TCZ infusions for 2 months), respectively, in 3 patients; moderate thrombocytopenia and moderate neutropenia in 2 patients; and a 5-fold increase in transaminase levels in another that improved after TCZ dose reduction. Conclusion TCZ remains a valuable GC-sparing option in the oldest GCA patients with an interesting risk-benefit ratio. Mild-to-moderate adverse events were observed in one-third of patients.