Fast and Accurate Determination of the Singlet–Triplet Gap in Donor–Acceptor and Multiresonance TADF Molecules by Using Hole–Hole Tamm–Dancoff Approximated Density Functional Theory

Abstract One of the requirements to design efficient emitters based on the multiresonance (MR)‐ or donor–acceptor (D‐A) thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials is a relatively small energy gap between the lowest singlet and triplet excited states (Δ E ST ). High‐level ab initio cal...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inAdvanced theory and simulations Vol. 5; no. 8
Main Authors Woon, Kai‐lin, Nikishau, Pavel, Sini, Gjergji
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Wiley 01.06.2022
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract One of the requirements to design efficient emitters based on the multiresonance (MR)‐ or donor–acceptor (D‐A) thermally activated delayed fluorescence (TADF) materials is a relatively small energy gap between the lowest singlet and triplet excited states (Δ E ST ). High‐level ab initio calculations of their Δ E ST provide benchmark results, but they are very time consuming and little practical for large‐size systems. Here, the performances of hole–hole Tamm–Dancoff approximated density functional theory (hh‐TDA‐DFT) and the functional dependent accuracy of hh‐TDA are examined on Δ E ST of a large number of MR‐ and D‐A TADF molecules. The results indicate that hh‐TDA combined with the hybrid functional B3LYP can predict Δ E ST values for a wide number of MR‐TADF molecules with mean absolute error (MAE) within 0.04 eV with correlation as high as 0.75. For D‐A TADF molecules, Δ E ST is less sensitive to the nature of the functionals, with MAE as low as 0.07 eV. The larger discrepancy between Δ E ST obtained from hh‐TDA‐DFT and experimental data in several oxygen‐containing MR‐TADF molecules is assumed to stem from the aggregation tendency of these compounds in solution. These findings provide important insights on the role of aggregation in reducing the Δ E ST of MR‐TADF compounds.
ISSN:2513-0390
DOI:10.1002/adts.202200056