Air quality in swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies/Qualidade do ar em instalacoes para suinos em crescimento e terminacao com diferentes tipologias construtivas

• Published in: Revista brasileira de engenharia agrícola e ambiental Vol. 21; no. 5; p. 339
• Main Authors: Cecchin, Daiane, Campos, Alessandro T, Cruz, Vasco F. da, Sousa, Francine A, Amaral, Pedro I.S, Junior, Tadayuki Yanagi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: Portuguese
• Published: ATECEL--Associacao Tecnico Cientifica Ernesto Luiz de Oliveira Junior 01.05.2017
• Subjects: Brasil
• ISSN: 1415-4366; 1807-1929
• DOI: 10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v21n5p339-343

The objective of this study was to evaluate the concentration of gases in three swine growing and finishing facilities with different building typologies, regarding floor and dividers. The experiment compared three treatments: pen with water depth, pen with partially slotted floor on the sides, and pen with partially slotted floor on sides and in the center. Measurements of instantaneous concentrations of ammonia (N[H.sub.3] ppm) and carbon dioxide (C[O.sub.2] ppm) were taken at animal level. The levels of sound pressure (dB) at animal level and at 1.50 m from the floor were also recorded. It was observed that the pen with water depth was the one with the highest average concentration of N[H.sub.3]. Although there was a significant difference in C[O.sub.2] concentrations, the observed values are within the limits allowed by the Brazilian standards; thus, it is assumed that the facilities do not cause discomfort in relation to C[O.sub.2] levels. The pen with water depth possibly caused discomfort to the animals, since the N[H.sub.3] concentration was above the values that can cause problems to the animals, according to the recommendation of the literature. There was no influence of the type of pen on the sound pressure at any time.