Assessment of the Addition of Cricket Flours: A Chemometric Evaluation of Their Pasting Properties

Edible insects have been evaluated as an alternative and sustainable source of protein because of their nutritive and functional properties for humans and domestic animals. The objective of this study was to assess the use of chemometric [principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inApplied sciences Vol. 14; no. 16
Main Authors Nastasi, Joseph Robert, Ma, Siyu, Alagappan, Shanmugam, Hoffman, Louwrens C, Cozzolino, Daniel
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published MDPI AG 01.08.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Edible insects have been evaluated as an alternative and sustainable source of protein because of their nutritive and functional properties for humans and domestic animals. The objective of this study was to assess the use of chemometric [principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS)] combined with Rapid Visco Analyser (RVA) profiles to evaluate the addition of cricket powder (CKP) to chickpea (CPF) and flaxseed (FxF) flours. The results of this study showed that the addition of CKP powder to both CPF and FxF flours affects the pasting properties of the samples; in particular, a reduction in the peak (PV) and final viscosity (FV) was observed. The use of chemometric data techniques such as PCA and PLS regression allowed for a better interpretation of the RVA profiles. Both PCA and PLS regression allowed to qualitative and quantitatively identify the addition level of CKP powder to CPF and FxF flour samples. Differences in the PLS loadings associated with the RVA profile due to the addition of cricket powder were observed. The development of these methodologies will provide researchers and the food industry with better tools to both improve and monitor the quality of ingredients with functional properties as well as to further understand the use of insects as alternative sources of protein.
ISSN:2076-3417
2076-3417
DOI:10.3390/app14167131