JUDGES IMMUNITY IN FACE OF THE ILLICIT EVIDENCE: ANALYSIS OF ARTICLE 157, [section] 5 OF THE BRAZILIAN CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE/A IMUNIDADE DO JUIZ DIANTE DA PROVA ILICITA: EXAME DO ART. 157, [section] 5 DO CODIGO DE PROCESSO PENAL BRASILEIRO

This article aims to assess the constitutionality of article 157, paragraph 5, of the Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code, introduced by Law 13.964/2019. In this sense, through a critical analysis of the illicit evidence in the criminal proceeding, we proceed to the evaluation of its impacts in the co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista eletrônica de direito processual Vol. 22; no. 3; p. 434
Main Authors de Pinho, Humberto Dalla Bernardina, Nobrega, Rafael Estrela
Format Journal Article
LanguagePortuguese
Published Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj 01.09.2021
Subjects
Brasil
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:This article aims to assess the constitutionality of article 157, paragraph 5, of the Brazilian Criminal Procedure Code, introduced by Law 13.964/2019. In this sense, through a critical analysis of the illicit evidence in the criminal proceeding, we proceed to the evaluation of its impacts in the conduct of the process, as well as in the execution of the criminal sentence and the formation of the judge's conviction. This article adds a pragmatic debate about the expansion of causes of suspicion and its impacts on the routine of the national Judiciary, especially in defense of impartiality and the better formation of procedural truth for the exercise of state punitive power. KEYWORDS: impartiality; judicial control; illicit evidence; criminal proceedings; decision. O presente artigo tem como objetivo avaliar a constitucionalidade do artigo 157, [section] 5, do Codigo de Processo Penal Brasileiro, introduzido pela Lei 13.964/2019. Nesse sentido, atraves de uma analise critica acerca da prova ilicita no processo penal, passa-se a avaliacao de seus impactos na conducao do processo, bem como na consecucao da sentenca penal e formacao do convencimento do julgador. O artigo acrescenta debate pragmatico sobre a ampliacao de causas de suspeicao e seus impactos na rotina do Judiciario nacional, sobretudo em defesa da imparcialidade e da melhor formacao da verdade processual para o exercicio do poder punitivo estatal. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: imparcialidade; controle judicial; prova ilicita; processo penal; decisao.
ISSN:1982-7636
1982-7636