THE NEW CPC AND A SUPERACAO DA JURISPRUDENCIA DEFENSIVA

The purpose of this article is to critically analyze critically the defensive jurisprudence, understood as the creation of obstacles to the admissibility of resources directed to the Courts, especially to the Superior Courts. It is intended to demonstrate that, against the backdrop of the constituti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inRevista eletrônica de direito processual Vol. 19; no. 3; p. 543
Main Author Couto, Monica Bonetti
Format Journal Article
LanguageSpanish
Published Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj 01.09.2018
Subjects
Analysis
Civil procedure
Judicial opinions
Jurisprudence
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The purpose of this article is to critically analyze critically the defensive jurisprudence, understood as the creation of obstacles to the admissibility of resources directed to the Courts, especially to the Superior Courts. It is intended to demonstrate that, against the backdrop of the constitutional model of civil procedure, the provisions of the New Code of Civil Procedure must overcome the defensive jurisprudence. KEYWORDS: Defensive jurisprudence--Judicial decisions--Overcoming--New Code of Civil Procedure--Constitutional process model. RESUMO: O objetivo do artigo e analisar criticamente a jurisprudencia defensiva, entendida como a criacao de obstaculos a admissibilidade de recursos dirigidos aos Tribunais, sobretudo aos Tribunais Superiores. Pretende-se demonstrar que, tendo como pano de fundo o modelo constitucional de processo civil, as disposicoes do Novo Codigo de Processo Civil deverao superar a jurisprudencia defensiva. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Jurisprudencia defensiva--Decisoes judiciais--Superacao--Novo Codigo de Processo Civil--Modelo constitucional de processo.
ISSN:1982-7636
1982-7636