Clinical Audit on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

• Published in: International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Vol. 16; p. 1901
• Main Authors: Kwan, Wing Yan Wendy, Wong, Tseng Kwong, Chan, Pang Fai, Liang, Jun, Leung, Wing Kit, Chen, Xiao Rui Catherine, Luk, Wan, Hui, Ming Tung Eric, Chao, VK David, Ng, Sze Wing Catherine, Li, Yim Chu, Ko, Wai Kit Welchie, Wong, Man Ying Michelle, Fu, Sau Nga
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Dove Medical Press Limited 31.07.2021
• Subjects: Development and progression; Evidence-based medicine; Influenza vaccines; Lung diseases, Obstructive; Medical care; Quality management
• ISSN: 1178-2005

Objective: To enhance the quality of COPD management in primary care via a two-phase clinical audit in Hong Kong. Methods: COPD patients aged 40 or above and had attended any of the 73 public primary care clinics under the Hospital Authority of Hong Kong (HAHK) for follow up (FU) during the audit period were included. Performance of six evidence-based audit criteria on COPD care was reviewed in phase 1 from 1st April 2017 to 31st March 2018. Service gaps were identified and a series of quality improvement strategies were executed in the one-year implementation phase. The outcome of the service enhancement was assessed in phase 2 from 1st April 2019 to 31st March 2020. Student's t-test and the chi-square test were used to examine the statistically significant differences between the two phases. Results: Totally 10,385 COPD cases were identified in phase 1, the majority were male (87.7%) and the mean age was 75.3 [+ or -] 9.9 years. Among the 3102 active smokers, 1788 (57.6%) were referred to receive the smoking cessation counselling and 1578 (50.9%) actually attended it. A total of 4866 cases (46.9%) received seasonal influenza vaccine (SIV) and 4227 cases (40.7%) received pneumococcal vaccine (PCV). A total of 1983 patients (19.1%) had spirometry test done before and 1327 patients (12.8%) had history of hospital admission due to acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD). After the proactive implementation phase, performance on all criteria was significantly improved in phase 2, with a marked increase in the SIV and PCV uptake rate and spirometry performance rate. Most importantly, a significant reduction in AECOPD rate leading to hospital admission had been achieved (9.6%, P<0.00001). Conclusion: COPD care at all public primary care clinics of HAHK had been significantly improved for all audit criteria via the systematic team approach, which, in turn, reduced the hospital admission rate and helped relieve the burden of the health care system. Keywords: clinical audit, COPD, quality improvement, primary care