Reasons Why Women Accept or Reject the Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine

The aim of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the reasons why pregnant women accept or reject the seasonal influenza vaccine. The qualitative descriptive design used a face-to-face semi-structured interview format. Sixty pregnant and postpartum women at two hospitals in the Northeast...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inMaternal and child health journal Vol. 17; no. 1; p. 156
Main Authors Colson, Eve R, Grizas, Alexandra P, Stiller, Robert, Vázquez, Marietta, Meharry, Pamela M
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Springer 01.01.2013
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:The aim of the study was to gain an in-depth understanding of the reasons why pregnant women accept or reject the seasonal influenza vaccine. The qualitative descriptive design used a face-to-face semi-structured interview format. Sixty pregnant and postpartum women at two hospitals in the Northeastern United States participated. Content analysis was the inductive method used to code the data and identify emergent themes. Six themes emerged from the data: differing degrees of influence affect action to vaccinate; two-for-one benefit is a pivotal piece of knowledge that influences future vaccination; fear if I do (vaccinate), fear if I don't; women who verbalize 'no need' for the vaccine also fear the vaccine; a conveniently located venue for vaccination reduces barriers to uptake; H1N1-a benefit and barrier to the seasonal vaccine. Our study supports previous findings and reveals a deeper understanding and interpretation of the behavior and decision-making to accept or reject the influenza vaccine. Understanding the reasons behind the behavior of vaccine rejection gives us the chance to change it.
ISSN:1092-7875