Real-world effectiveness of umeclidinium/vilanterol versus fluticasone propionate/salmeterol as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Background and objective: Retrospective claims data in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating maintenance therapy with inhaled fixed-dose combinations of long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting [[beta].sub.2]-agonist (LAMA/LABA) versus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease p. 1721
Main Authors Bengtson, Lindsay G.S, Le, Lisa, Moretz, Chad, Ray, Riju, Sharpsten, Lucie, Koep, Eleena, Stanford, Richard H, Tong, Junliang, Hahn, Beth
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Dove Medical Press Limited 01.08.2019
Subjects
Analysis
Asthma
Care and treatment
Chronic obstructive lung disease
Combination drug therapy
Corticosteroid drugs
Drugstores
Glucocorticoids
Health insurance industry
Insurance companies
Insurance industry
Lung diseases
Medical research
Medicare
Patient compliance
Pharmacy
Respiratory system agents
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:Background and objective: Retrospective claims data in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) initiating maintenance therapy with inhaled fixed-dose combinations of long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting [[beta].sub.2]-agonist (LAMA/LABA) versus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/LABA have not been reported. Methods: Retrospective observational study in a COPD-diagnosed population of commercial and Medicare Advantage with Part D (MAPD) enrollees aged [greater than or equal to]40 years from a US health insurer database. Patients initiated umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI [62.5/25 ug]) or fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FP/SAL [250/50 ug]) between April 1, 2014 and August 31, 2016 (index date) and had 12 months continuous enrollment pre- and post-index. Exclusion criteria included an asthma diagnosis in the pre-index period/index date; ICS-, LABA-, or LAMA-containing therapy during the pre-index period; or pharmacy fills for both UMEC/VI and FP/SAL, multiple-inhaler triple therapy, a non-index therapy, or COPD exacerbation on the index date. Adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] [greater than or equal to]80%) was modeled using weighted logistic regression following inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Weighted Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression following IPTW were performed for incidence of COPD exacerbation and escalation to multiple-inhaler triple therapy. Results: The study population included 5306 patients (1386 initiating UMEC/VI and 3920 initiating FP/SAL). Adjusted odds of adherence were 2.00 times greater among UMEC/VI than FP/SAL initiators (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62-2.46; P<0.001). The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for first exacerbation was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74-1.01; P=0.067) among UMEC/VI versus FP/SAL initiators. UMEC/VI initiators had 35% lower adjusted risk of escalation to multiple-inhaler triple therapy (HR 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89; P=0.008) versus FP/SAL. On-treatment, UMEC/VI initiators had an adjusted 30% reduced risk of a first moderate/severe COPD exacerbation (HR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.54-0.90; P=0.006). Conclusion: Patients with COPD initiating UMEC/VI had higher adherence and longer time before escalation to multiple-inhaler triple therapy than FP/SAL initiators. Keywords: COPD, LAMA/LABA, ICS/LABA, real-world effectiveness, retrospective cohort
ISSN:1178-2005