Bipolar nanosecond electric pulses are less efficient at electropermeabilization and killing cells than monopolar pulses

• Main Authors: Ibey, Bennett L, Jody C. UlleryauthorGeneral Dynamics Information Systems, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA, Olga N. PakhomovaauthorFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA, Caleb C. RothauthorGeneral Dynamics Information Systems, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX, USADepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA, Iurii SemenovauthorFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA, Hope T. BeierauthorRadio Frequency Bioeffects Branch, Bioeffects Division, Human Effectiveness Directorate, 711th Human Performance Wing, Air Force Research Laboratory, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA, Melissa TarangoauthorGeneral Dynamics Information Systems, JBSA Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA, Shu XiaoauthorFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA, Karl H. SchoenbachauthorFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA, Andrei G. PakhomovauthorFrank Reidy Research Center for Bioelectrics, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 2015
• Subjects: animal ovaries; Bipolar; calcium; cell viability; Chinese hamsters; CHO; confocal microscopy; death; dyes; electric field; flow cytometry; FM1-43; Monopolar; Nanosecond electric pulse; propidium; survival rate