Use of covariance technique in screening mungbean accessions for waterlogging resistance

Flooding is often a problem in rainfed lowland under pre-rice or post-rice conditions. A field study was established to identify mungbean genotypes for waterlogging resistance. The experiment involved 220 mungbean accessions obtained from Chai Nat Field Crops Research Center, Thailand and the Instit...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inThai Agricultural Research Journal Vol. 12; no. 2
Main Authors Somsong Chotechuen, Carangal, Virgilio R. (Department of Agriculture, Bangkok (Thailand). Chai Nat Field Crops Research Center)
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.05.1994
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Flooding is often a problem in rainfed lowland under pre-rice or post-rice conditions. A field study was established to identify mungbean genotypes for waterlogging resistance. The experiment involved 220 mungbean accessions obtained from Chai Nat Field Crops Research Center, Thailand and the Institute of plant Breeding, UPLB, Philippines. The 220 accessions included the variety Pag-asa 5 and Pag-asa 1 as resistant (R) and susceptible (S) check, respectively. The S-check was also planted alternately after every five plots of the test genotypes to monitor variation in the level of flooding stress over an experimental area. The experiment was designed in randomized complete block with 2 replications. Plants were subjected to flooding twice, at 15 and 30 days after emergence. Flooding at each time lasted for six days. Data was analyzed by the analysis of covariance using an average of the 2 nearest S-checks as covariate. Substantial variability among the 220 mungbean accessions was observed in most plant characteristics. Results of the analysis showed that covariance technique can be used as an efficient method to adjust for variability between the test plots. Based on yielding ability after flooded condition, six out of the 220 accessions were classified as resistant varieties, i.e., IPB M 82 21-28. Seed yields of these varieties ranged from 354.3 to 466.0 kg/ha while the yield of resistant check (Pag-asa 5) and susceptible check (Pag-asa 1) were 268.7 and 158.8 kg/ha, respectively.
Bibliography:F30
H50
2001000626
ISSN:0125-8389