Comparative Enantiomer Separation on Chiral Stationary Phases Derived from Chiral Crown Ether by HPLC

Comparative liquid chromatographic enantiomer separation of α-amino acids, their esters and primary amino compounds was performed using two chiral stationary phases (CSPs) prepared by covalently bonding (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid (18-C-6-TA) of the same chiral selector. In gener...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKorean Society for Biotechnology and Bioengineering Journal Vol. 27; no. 4
Main Authors Huang, Hu, Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea, Jeon, S.H., Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea, Kim, J.Y., Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea, Lee, W.J., Chosun University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
Format Journal Article
LanguageKorean
Published 01.07.2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Comparative liquid chromatographic enantiomer separation of α-amino acids, their esters and primary amino compounds was performed using two chiral stationary phases (CSPs) prepared by covalently bonding (+)-(18-crown-6)-2,3,11,12-tetracarboxylic acid (18-C-6-TA) of the same chiral selector. In general, the separation factors and resolution factors for these analytes on CSP 1 were greater than on CSP 2, while these capacity factors on CSP 2 were quite greater than on CSP 1. Except for leucine methyl ester and phenylalanine methyl ester, the elution orders of all analytes including α-amino α-alkyl acids and phenylglycine alkyl esters on CSP 1 are identical to those on CSP 2. This study showed that different connecting structures for these two CSPs might influence their ability to resolve the analytes depending on their structures related to the chiral recognition mechanism.
Bibliography:2013002293
E21
ISSN:1225-7117