Understanding the ecological drivers of avian influenza virus infection in wildfowl

Despite considerable effort for surveillance of wild birds for avian influenza viruses (AIVs), empirical investigations of ecological drivers of AIV prevalence in wild birds are still scarce. Here we used a continental-scale dataset, collected in tropical wetlands of 15 African countries, to test th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences Vol. 279; no. 1731
Main Authors Gaidet N, Caron A, Cappelle J, Cumming G.S, Balança G, Hammoumi S, Cattoli G, Abolnik C, Servan de Almeida R, Gil P, Fereidouni S.R, Grosbois V, Tran A, Mundava J, Fofana B, Ould El Mamy A.B, Ndlovu M, Mondain-Monval J.Y, Triplet P, Hagemeijer W, Karesh W.B, Newman S.H, Dodman T
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 2012
Subjects
Online AccessGet more information

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Despite considerable effort for surveillance of wild birds for avian influenza viruses (AIVs), empirical investigations of ecological drivers of AIV prevalence in wild birds are still scarce. Here we used a continental-scale dataset, collected in tropical wetlands of 15 African countries, to test the relative roles of a range of ecological factors on patterns of AIV prevalence in wildfowl. Seasonal and geographical variations in prevalence were positively related to the local density of the wildfowl community and to the wintering period of Eurasian migratory birds in Africa. The predominant influence of wildfowl density with no influence of climatic conditions suggests, in contrast to temperate regions, a predominant role for inter-individual transmission rather than transmission via long-lived virus persisting in the environment. Higher prevalences were found in Anas species than in non-Anas species even when we account for differences in their foraging behaviour (primarily dabbling or not) or their geographical origin (Eurasian or Afro-tropical), suggesting the existence of intrinsic differences between wildfowl taxonomic groups in receptivity to infection. Birds were found infected as often in oropharyngeal as in cloacal samples, but rarely for both types of sample concurrently, indicating that both respiratory and digestive tracts may be important for AIV replication. Keywords: influenza A virus; pathogen transmission; disease ecology; wild birds; tropical; migration. (Résumé d'auteur)
Bibliography:http://publications.cirad.fr/une_notice.php?dk=563531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1417
Maladies des animaux
Ecologie animale