Corticotropin-Releasing Factor (CRF) Agonists Stimulate Testosterone Production in Mouse Leydig Cells through CRF Receptor-11

• Published in: Endocrinology (Philadelphia) Vol. 139; no. 2; pp. 651 - 658
• Main Authors: Heinrich, Nadja, Meyer, Mike R, Furkert, Jens, Sasse, Annette, Beyermann, Michael, Bönigk, Wolfgang, Berger, Hartmut
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: Endocrine Society 01.02.1998
• ISSN: 0013-7227; 1945-7170
• DOI: 10.1210/endo.139.2.5754

The influence of CRF on testosterone production in primary mouse Leydig cell cultures was studied, and the type of CRF receptor (CRF-R) involved in this activity was determined. CRF directly stimulated testosterone production in mouse Leydig cells, but did not influence the maximum human (h)CG-induced testosterone production. The effect was time- and dose-dependent, saturable with an EC50 of 2.84 nm for hCRF, antagonized by the CRF antagonist α-helical CRF9–41, and accompanied by intracellular cAMP elevation. The rank order of potency of the natural CRF agonists, hCRF, ovine CRF, sauvagine, and urotensin, corresponded to that of their activities on CRF-R1 in rat pituitary cells and also to that reported for this receptor, but not for CRF-R2, when transfected into various cell lines. Furthermore, the difference in response of mouse Leydig cells to[ 11-d-Thr,12-d-Phe]- and[ 13-d-His,14-d-Leu]-ovine CRF corresponded to that measured when COS cells expressing CRF-R1 were activated, but was considerably smaller than that observed for activation of COS cells expressing CRF-R2α or -R2β. The messenger RNA encoding the mouse CRF-R1 was detected by RT-PCR in mouse Leydig cell preparations. In contrast to mouse Leydig cells, CRF agonists had no influence on the basal testosterone and cAMP production by rat Leydig cells, nor did the agonists or antagonist change the hCG-stimulated testosterone and cAMP production by these cells. It is concluded that mouse Leydig cells express CRF-R1, mediating elevation of testosterone production by CRF agonists through cAMP. Because potencies of CRF agonists in activating mouse Leydig cells were more than 10-fold lower compared with their potencies in stimulating rat pituitary cells, it is suggested that the coupling of the CRF-R1 to intracellular signaling in Leydig cells is different from that in corticotropic pituitary cells, at least in quantitative terms.