Reply to comment on the possible role of the reaction H+H 2O→H 2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures
In reply to “Comment on the possible role of reaction H+H 2O→H 2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures” (Bartels, 2009 Comment on the possible role of the reaction H+H 2O→H 2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78, 191–194) we present an alternative t...
Saved in:
Published in | Radiation physics and chemistry (Oxford, England : 1993) Vol. 79; no. 1; pp. 52 - 56 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier Ltd
2010
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | In reply to “Comment on the possible role of reaction H+H
2O→H
2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures” (Bartels, 2009 Comment on the possible role of the reaction H+H
2O→H
2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78, 191–194) we present an alternative thermodynamic estimation of the reaction rate constant
k. Based on the non-symmetric standard state convention we have calculated that the Gibbs energy of reaction Δ
r
G=57.26
kJ
mol
−1 and the reaction rate constant
k=7.23×10
−5
M
−1
s
−1 at ambient temperature. Re-analysis of the thermodynamic estimation (Bartels, 2009 Comment on the possible role of the reaction H+H
2O→H
2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78, 191–194) showed that the upper limit for the rate constant at 573
K is
k=1.75×10
4
M
−1
s
−1 compared to the value predicted by the diffusion-kinetic modelling (3.18±1.25)×10
4
M
−1
s
−1 (Swiatla-Wojcik, D., Buxton, G.V., 2005. On the possible role of the reaction H+H
2O→H
2+OH in the radiolysis of water at high temperatures. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 74(3–4), 210–219). The presented thermodynamic evaluation of
k(573) is based on the assumption that
k can be calculated from Δ
r
G and the rate constant of the reverse reaction which, as discussed, are both uncertain at high temperatures. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0969-806X 1879-0895 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2009.07.024 |