Enhanced methanol production from recycled methanotrophic biomass and its effect on the emission and performance characteristics of a four-stroke compression ignition engine

[Display omitted] •Cumulative methanol titer: 3.6 g/L attained after 3 batches of biomass recycling.•Methanotroph-derived bio-methanol blended with diesel for fuelling CI engine.•Methanol blending with diesel reduced BSCO, BSHC, BSH2S and smoke emissions.•Diesel-methanol blends improved BSFC, BSEC,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFuel (Guildford) Vol. 371
Main Authors Sahoo, Krishna Kalyani, Das, Debasish
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Ltd 01.09.2024
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:[Display omitted] •Cumulative methanol titer: 3.6 g/L attained after 3 batches of biomass recycling.•Methanotroph-derived bio-methanol blended with diesel for fuelling CI engine.•Methanol blending with diesel reduced BSCO, BSHC, BSH2S and smoke emissions.•Diesel-methanol blends improved BSFC, BSEC, BTE and AFR relative to D100.•Blends delivered D100-equivalent mechanical efficiency. Methanol production was demonstrated through recycling of Methylosinus trichosporium biomass to curtail time and resources incurred towards recurrent biomass generation. Cumulative methanol titer of 3.6 g/L was achieved after three cycles of biomass reutilization. Methanol was recovered from cultivation medium using distillation attaining a maximum purity of 94.74 %. Different blends of methanol (0–20 % v/v) with diesel were evaluated for their suitability as alternate transportation fuel. Physicochemical properties of diesel-methanol blends either improved or exhibited equivalence relative to pure diesel, as control. The blends were investigated for their effect on emission and performance characteristics of four-stroke compression ignition engine under varying engine loads (25, 50, 75 and 100 %). Brake specific emissions of CO, hydrocarbon and H2S decreased with increasing methanol content in the blend, attaining maximum decrements of 38.8–46.5 %, 39.8–60.7 % and 85.4–87.8 %, respectively, with 20 % methanol-containing blend (M20) under varying engine loads. On the other hand, brake specific NOx emission increased by 27.7–34.8 % under the same conditions. Superior performance parameters e.g., brake specific fuel consumption (0.29 kg kW−1h−1), brake specific energy consumption (12.9 MJ kW−1h−1) and brake thermal efficiency (28 %), were achieved using M20, while mechanical efficiency (80.8 %) exhibited equivalence with pure diesel.
ISSN:0016-2361
1873-7153
DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132142