2-(4-Ethoxyphenlytelluromethyl)tetrahydro-2 H-pyran ( L1) and 2-(2-{4-ethoxyphenyl}telluroethyl)-1,3-dioxane ( L2): synthesis, reactions of L1 with iodine and ligation of L1 with Ru(II), Cu(I), and Hg(II) and L2 with Ru(II). Crystal structures of [RuCl 2( p-cymene)· L1/ L2]

2-(4-Ethoxyphenlytelluromethyl)tetrahydro-2 H-pyran ( L 1 ) and 2-(2-{4-ethoxyphenyl}telluroethyl)-1,3-dioxane ( L 2 ) have been synthesized by reacting in situ generated ArTe −Na + with an appropriate organic halide. The reaction of L 1 with iodine results in its diiodo derivative [ L 1 (I) 2] ( 1)...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInorganica Chimica Acta Vol. 320; no. 1; pp. 133 - 140
Main Authors Singh, Ajai K., Kadarkaraisamy, M., Mishra, M., Sooriyakumar, J., Drake, J.E., Hursthouse, M.B., Light, M.E., Jasinski, Jerry P.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier B.V 2001
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:2-(4-Ethoxyphenlytelluromethyl)tetrahydro-2 H-pyran ( L 1 ) and 2-(2-{4-ethoxyphenyl}telluroethyl)-1,3-dioxane ( L 2 ) have been synthesized by reacting in situ generated ArTe −Na + with an appropriate organic halide. The reaction of L 1 with iodine results in its diiodo derivative [ L 1 (I) 2] ( 1) . The complexes of stoichiometries [CuBr L 1 ] ( 2), [HgBr 2 L 1 ] ( 3) and [RuCl 2( p-cymene)· L 1 / L 2 ] ( 4/ 5) are synthesized. The NMR ( 1H and 13C) in conjunction with elemental analyses, molecular weight and conductance measurements were used to characterize L 1 , L 2 , 1 and the complexes 2– 5. The ligands coordinate in all the complexes through Te, as indicated by the deshielding of CH 2Te signals (up to ∼0.8 ppm) with respect to those of free ligands, except in the case of 2 in which bonding through CH 2O has also to be invoked. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized structurally (RuTe bond length: 2.619(8) and 2.642(1) Å, respectively). The RuCl bond lengths are in the range 2.404(3)–2.420(6) Å. The TeC(aryl) bond is shorter than the TeC(alkyl) bond in 4 but similar in 5. The two Ru(II) complexes are the first examples with potential (Te, O) ligands of Ar(R)Te type, which have been structurally characterized. 2-(4-Ethoxyphenlytelluromethyl)tetrahydro-2 H-pyran ( L 1 ), 2-(2-{4-ethoxyphenyl}telluroethyl)-1,3-dioxane ( L 2 ), diiodo derivative of L 1 and complexes of stoichiometries [CuBr L 1 ] ( 2), [HgBr 2 L 1 ] ( 3) and [RuCl 2( p-cymene)· L 1 / L 2 ] ( 4/ 5) have been synthesized. The two ligands coordinate in all the complexes through Te, except in the case of 2 in which bonding through CH 2O has also to be invoked. Complexes 4 and 5 are characterized structurally. The RuTe bond lengths are 2.619(8) and 2.642(1) Å in 4 and 5, respectively. The RuCl bond length is in the range 2.404(3)–2.420(6) Å. The TeC(aryl) bond is shorter than the TeC(alkyl) bond in 4 but similar in 5.
ISSN:0020-1693
1873-3255
DOI:10.1016/S0020-1693(01)00491-1