Ionic-size effect on the structure and Tc of T′-(R 1− xR′ x) 1.85Ce 0.15CuO 4 (R Pr, Nd, Sm and Eu; R′ Gd and Y)
(R 1− x R′ x ) 1.85Ce 0.15CuO 4 (R Pr, Nd, Sm and Eu; R′ Gd and Y) have been investigated by means of X-ray diffraction, electrical-resistivity, and magnetic-susceptibility measurements. Lattice parameters a, c, and the unit-cell volume V decrease with increasing Gd or Y concentration x, and the...
Saved in:
Published in | Physica. C, Superconductivity Vol. 260; no. 1; pp. 117 - 124 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
Elsevier B.V
1996
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | (R
1−
x
R′
x
)
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4 (R Pr, Nd, Sm and Eu; R′ Gd and Y) have been investigated by means of X-ray diffraction, electrical-resistivity, and magnetic-susceptibility measurements. Lattice parameters
a,
c, and the unit-cell volume
V decrease with increasing Gd or Y concentration
x, and the decreasing rates with Y are larger than those with Gd. It is found that the critical concentration
x
c, at which the superconductivity disappears, depends on the ionic size of R, and the
T
c suppression rate for each system with Y doping is larger than that with Gd doping. Thus the effect of a small ionic radius for Y plays a much more important role than the large magnetic moment for Gd on the suppression of superconductivity in (R
1−
x
R′
x
)
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4. From the observations of the deviation of the lattice parameters in R
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4 and the rapid increase of | dln
T
c/d
x | in (Eu
1−
x
Y
x
)
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4, the structural distortion boundar estimated to lie between Eu
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4 and Gd
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4. This provides clear evidence that the absence of superconductivity for Gd
1.85Ce
0.15CuO
4 is due to weak ferromagnetism in the CuO planes resulting from the too small ionic radius of Gd, which induces a lattice distortion in the T′ structure. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0921-4534 1873-2143 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0921-4534(96)00135-9 |