Evidence for neuropeptide Y mediation of eating produced by food deprivation and for a variant of the Y 1 receptor mediating this peptide's effect

Neuropeptide Y (NPY) elicits eating when injected directly into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or perifornical hypothalamus (PFH). To identify the essential regions of the NPY molecule and the relative contributions of Y 1 and Y 2 receptors, the eating stimulatory potency of NPY was compared to t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPeptides (New York, N.Y. : 1980) Vol. 13; no. 3; pp. 581 - 587
Main Authors Stanley, B.G., Magdalin, W., Seirafi, A., Nguyen, M.M., Leibowitz, S.F.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier Inc 1992
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Neuropeptide Y (NPY) elicits eating when injected directly into the paraventricular nucleus (PVN) or perifornical hypothalamus (PFH). To identify the essential regions of the NPY molecule and the relative contributions of Y 1 and Y 2 receptors, the eating stimulatory potency of NPY was compared to that of its fragments, analogues, and agonists when injected into the PVN or PFH of satiated rats. Additionally, antisera to NPY was injected into the cerebral ventricles (ICV) to determine whether passive immunization suppresses the eating produced by mild food deprivation. Tests with NPY fragments revealed that NPY(2–36) was surprisingly potent, nearly three times more so than intact NPY. In contrast, fragments with further N- terminal deletions were progressively less effective or ineffective, as was the free acid form of NPY. Collectively, this suggests that both N- and C- terminal regions of NPY participate in the stimulation of eating. Tests with agonists revealed that the putative Y 1 agonist [Pro 34]NPY elicited a strong dose-dependent feeding response, while the putative Y 2 agonist, C2-NPY, had only a small effect at the highest doses. Although this suggests mediation by Y 1 receptors, the uncharacteristically high potency of NPY(2–36) may additionally suggest that the receptor subtype underlying feeding is distinct from that mediating other responses. Additional results revealed that ICV injection of antisera to NPY, which should inactivate endogenous NPY, produced a concentration-dependent suppression of eating induced by mild food deprivation. This finding, along with published work demonstrating enhanced levels of hypothalamic NPY in food-deprived rats, suggests that endogenous NPY mediates the eating produced by deprivation.
ISSN:0196-9781
1873-5169
DOI:10.1016/0196-9781(92)90093-I