QoS management in smart grids: a Markovian approach

In Smart Grids, a variety of new applications are available to users of the electrical system (from consumers to the electric system operators and market operators). Some applications such as the SCADA systems, which control generators or substations, have consequences, for example, with a communica...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications Vol. 13; no. 2; pp. 122 - 138
Main Authors Marcelino S. da Silva, Carlos R. L. Francês, João C. W. A. Costa, Diego L. Cardoso, Nandamudi. L. Vijaykumar, Solon V. de Carvalho
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Sociedade Brasileira de Microondas e Optoeletrônica; Sociedade Brasileira de Eletromagnetismo
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In Smart Grids, a variety of new applications are available to users of the electrical system (from consumers to the electric system operators and market operators). Some applications such as the SCADA systems, which control generators or substations, have consequences, for example, with a communication delay. The result of a failure to deliver a control message due to noncompliance of the time constraint can be catastrophic. On the other hand, applications such as smart metering of consumption have fewer restrictions. Since each type of application has different quality of service requirements (importance, delay, and amount of data to transmit) to transmit its messages, the policy to control and share the resources of the data communication network must consider them. In this paper Markov Decision Process Theory is employed to determine optimal policies to explore as much as possible the availability of throughput in order to transmit all kinds of messages, considering the quality of service requirements defined to each kind of message. First a non-preemptive model is formulated and after that a preemptive model is derived. Numerical results are used to compare FIFO, non-preemptive and preemptive policies.
ISSN:2179-1074
2179-1074
DOI:10.1590/S2179-10742014000200002