Effect of Temperature on Flavor Substances of Yak Meat during Roasting as Analyzed by Chromatography-Ion Mobility Spectrometry and Chemometrics

In order to explore the difference in flavor among yak leg meat roasted at different temperatures, sensory evaluation, gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), relative odor activity value (ROAV), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and principal component analysis (P...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inShípĭn kēxué Vol. 44; no. 22; pp. 337 - 344
Main Author ZHANG Hao, YI Yuwen, ZHU Kaixian, DENG Jing, HU Jinxiang, LIU Yang, QIAO Mingfeng, BAI Ting
Format Magazine Article
LanguageEnglish
Published China Food Publishing Company 01.11.2023
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:In order to explore the difference in flavor among yak leg meat roasted at different temperatures, sensory evaluation, gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS), relative odor activity value (ROAV), partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA), and principal component analysis (PCA) were used in this study. The results showed that the samples roasted at 240 ℃ for 7 min had the highest (E) sensory evaluation score. A total of 82 compounds were identified by GC-IMS, including 15 aldehydes, 12 alcohols, 24 lipids, 14 ketones, 7 heterocycles, 3 olefins, and 7 other compounds. The total amount of these compounds in sample E (240 ℃) was the highest, followed by samples D (180 ℃) and C (120 ℃). The total amount of these compounds in sample F (300 ℃) was lower than that in sample E (240 ℃). The key flavor compounds of roasted yak meat were ethyl 2-hydroxypropanoate, 4-methylguaiacol, 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline, 5-nonanone, ethyl salicylate, 1-propanol, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, 1-penten-3-one, (E)-2-heptenal, linalyl acetate, butanol-D, methional-M, 2-ethyl-6-methylpyrazine, 4-hexen-1-ol, (Z)-4-decenal, 2,4-heptadienal, 2-phenylethanol, and ethyl butyrate. Sample E had roasted meat-like, fatty, flowery and fruity aromas, which was the best among these five samples. The flavor of samples C and D was lower than that of sample E, having nutty, toasty, sweet and smoked aromas.
ISSN:1002-6630
DOI:10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20230206-053