How has the Nobel Prize Affected the Canonisation of Japanese Literature? / Nobel Ödülü Japon Edebiyatının Kanonlaştırılmasını Nasıl Etkiledi?

From the 1950s to the 70s Japanese literature became the most widely read nonEuropean literature in translation in the USA and Western Europe, as such eminent writers like Tanizaki, Kawabata, Mishima, and Ōe were discovered in English translation. This discovery encouraged and inspired new translati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inFolklor/edebiyat Vol. 27; no. 107; pp. 927 - 942
Main Author Devrim Çetin Güven
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Cyprus International University 01.08.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:From the 1950s to the 70s Japanese literature became the most widely read nonEuropean literature in translation in the USA and Western Europe, as such eminent writers like Tanizaki, Kawabata, Mishima, and Ōe were discovered in English translation. This discovery encouraged and inspired new translations into other European and non-European languages that rendered Japanese literature popular throughout the planet. From the 1990s onward postmodern writers like Murakami and Yoshimoto rose also to global fame. Interestingly, the common point of all these internationally acclaimed writers is that they all have histories with the Nobel Prize in Literature: either they became laureates like Kawabata and Ōe, nominated like Tanizaki and Mishima; was considered as a Nobel candidate like Murakami, or merely “dreamt” of winning the prize someday like Yoshimoto. In this article, we treated the complex relations between Japanese writers and the Nobel Prize, which has become a symbol of cultural universality. We attempted to answer the following question: how have being considered a candidate, being nominated, winning, or losing the prize contributed to the universalisation of these writers?
ISSN:1300-7491
1300-7491
DOI:10.22559/folklor.1781