Outcomes of patients with malignant duodenal obstruction after receiving self-expandable metallic stents: A single center experience

ObjectivesSelf-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a safe and effective palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction; however, the clinical outcomes of gastric and duodenal stenoses may differ. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of SEMS placement and the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inPloS one Vol. 17; no. 5; p. e0268920
Main Authors Tien-Hsin Wei, Bing-Wei Ye, Pei-Shan Wu, Chung-Pin Li, Yee Chao, Pei-Chang Lee, Yi-Hsiang Huang, Kuei-Chuan Lee, Ming-Chih Hou
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Public Library of Science (PLoS) 01.01.2022
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:ObjectivesSelf-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) placement is a safe and effective palliative treatment for malignant gastric outlet obstruction; however, the clinical outcomes of gastric and duodenal stenoses may differ. This study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of SEMS placement and the predictors of clinical outcomes, specifically in malignant duodenal obstruction (MDO).MethodsBetween September 2009 and March 2021, 79 patients with MDO who received SEMS placement in our hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into three groups according to the obstruction levels: above-papilla group (type 1), papilla involved group (type 2), and below-papilla group (type 3). The clinical outcomes and predictors of survival and restenosis were analyzed.ResultsThe technical and clinical success rates were 97.5% and 80.5%, respectively. Among patients who had successful stent placement, stent restenosis occurred in 17 patients (22.1%). The overall median stent patency time was 103 days. The overall median survival time after stent placement was 116 days. There was no difference in the stent patency, or stent dysfunction and procedure-related adverse events among the three groups. A longer length of duodenal stenosis ≥ 4 cm was associated with poor prognosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.92, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.06-3.49, p = 0.032) and post-stent chemotherapy was associated with lower mortality (HR = 0.33; 95% CI = 0.17-0.63, p = 0.001).ConclusionSEMS is a safe and effective treatment for MDO. Chemotherapy after SEMS implantation improve the survival for these patients and a longer length of stenosis predicts higher mortality.
ISSN:1932-6203
DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0268920