Group-Based Exercise in CKD Stage 3b to 4: A Randomized Clinical TrialPlain-Language Summary

Rationale & Objective: We aimed to test interventions to improve physical activity in persons with advanced chronic kidney disease not yet receiving dialysis. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial with parallel-group design. Setting & Participants: We embedded a pragmatic referral to exe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inKidney medicine Vol. 3; no. 6; pp. 951 - 961.e1
Main Authors Shuchi Anand, Susan L. Ziolkowski, Ahad Bootwala, Jianheng Li, Nhat Pham, Jason Cobb, Felipe Lobelo
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published Elsevier 01.11.2021
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Rationale & Objective: We aimed to test interventions to improve physical activity in persons with advanced chronic kidney disease not yet receiving dialysis. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial with parallel-group design. Setting & Participants: We embedded a pragmatic referral to exercise programming in high-volume kidney clinics servicing diverse populations in San Jose, CA, and Atlanta, GA. We recruited 56 participants with estimated glomerular filtration rates < 45 mL/min/1.73 m2. Interventions: We randomly assigned participants to a mobile health (mHealth) group—wearable activity trackers and fitness professional counseling, or an Exercise is Medicine intervention framework (EIM) group—mHealth components plus twice-weekly small-group directed exercise sessions customized to persons with kidney disease. We performed assessments at baseline, 8 weeks at the end of active intervention, and 16 weeks after passive follow-up and used multilevel mixed models to assess between-group differences. Outcomes: Activity tracker total daily step count. Results: Of 56 participants, 86% belonged to a racial/ethnic minority group; randomly assigned groups were well balanced on baseline step count. In intention-to-treat analyses, the EIM and mHealth groups both experienced declines in daily step counts, but there was an attenuated reduction in light intensity physical activity (standard error 0.2 [5.8] vs −8.5 [5.4] min/d; P = 0.08) in the EIM compared with the mHealth group at 8 weeks. In as-treated analyses, total daily step count, distance covered, and light and moderate-vigorous activity minutes per day improved in the EIM group and declined in the mHealth group at 8 weeks (standard error +335 [506] vs −884 [340] steps per day; P = 0.05; P < 0.05 for secondary measures), but group differences faded at 16 weeks. There were no differences in quality-of-life and mental health measures during the study. Limitations: Small sample size, limited duration of study, assessment of intermediate outcomes (steps per day). Conclusions: A clinic-integrated referral to small-group exercise sessions is feasible, safe, and moderately effective in improving physical activity in an underserved population with high comorbid conditions. Funding: Normon S Coplon Applied Pragmatic Clinical Research program. Trial Registration: NCT03311763
ISSN:2590-0595
2590-0595