A comparative study between bier’s block and supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb below elbow surgeries
Background: Present clinical study was conducted to evaluate the onset of analgesia, degree of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia and complications between supraclavicular brachial plexus block and IVRA. Aim: The aim of this study is therefore to determine a superior method between Bi...
Saved in:
Published in | International journal of health sciences pp. 48409 - 48423 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
02.11.2022
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Background: Present clinical study was conducted to evaluate the onset of analgesia, degree of sensory and motor blockade, duration of analgesia and complications between supraclavicular brachial plexus block and IVRA. Aim: The aim of this study is therefore to determine a superior method between Bier’s block and supraclavicular brachial plexus block for upper limb below elbow surgery. Methods: The study was conducted on patient’s posted for various elective or emergency surgeries of the upper limb below elbow. The subjects were divided into two groups, Group 1 receiving supraclavicular brachial plexus block with 1% lignocaine with adrenaline, 0.6 mg/kg body weight and Group 2 receiving IVRA with 0.5% lignocaine 0.5ml/kg body weight. Patient’s vital parameters were monitored throughout the procedure. A thorough observation was made on onset, quality, duration of analgesia, degree of motor blockade and return of sensation after release of torniquet. Result: onset of analgesia for supraclavicular brachial plexus block is 11.8+/- 1.6 minutes whereas for IVRA it was 3.3+/- 0.8 minutes clearly indicating the early onset of analgesia with IVRA. Conclusion: IVRA appears to be a better alternative with regards to onset, quality of analgesia and degree of motor blockade. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2550-6978 2550-696X |
DOI: | 10.53730/ijhs.v6nS7.13581 |