Introducing a corporate concept into organisational practices: a case study of domestication and organisational choice

This article discusses a case of introducing and launching a new corporate concept, a so-called company-specific production system (XPS), into an organisation. Such concepts are at present very commonly used, but what does it take to implement a new logic into an existing organisation? As a theoreti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inEuropean Journal of Workplace Innovation Vol. 4; no. 2
Main Authors Haga, Trond, Ravn, Johan E.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 25.09.2019
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:This article discusses a case of introducing and launching a new corporate concept, a so-called company-specific production system (XPS), into an organisation. Such concepts are at present very commonly used, but what does it take to implement a new logic into an existing organisation? As a theoretical point of departure, the process was understood as a process of domestication, where the imported concept moves from being external, general and unfamiliar to becoming inter­nal and known, owned by the organisational culture and embedded in its practices. Domestication is a process where the import has to be rescripted through how the organisation, as individual members and as various collectives, enacts it, makes sense of it and understands it. The organisation in this case study had a rich tradition of participation, and in the process under study, members from most levels and functions were involved in the attempts to transform the general concept into something workable and company-specific. This paper takes a socio-technical design approach, which argues that organisations importing new technology or new organisational concepts are faced with choices, not with something inevitable. The study reveals the challenges of the domestication process and how the organisation faces not one choice but a multiplicity of interdependent choices, and how handling the process calls for an untraditional, complex and participatory approach.
ISSN:2387-4570
2387-4570
DOI:10.46364/ejwi.v4i2.571