Perspectives of Intensive Care patients and family members on competencies for Advanced Intensive Care nurses in Europe

Background One output from the International Nursing Advanced Competency-based Training for Intensive Care (INACTIC) collaboration is a set of core competencies for advanced practice Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses across Europe. Some European countries, such as the UK, have identified such compete...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational Journal of Critical Care Vol. 17; no. 2; pp. 23 - 38
Main Authors Jones, Christina, Peskett, Mo, Ramsay, Pam, Endacott, Ruth, Xyrichis, Andreas, Iliopoulou, Katerina
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 27.07.2023
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Background One output from the International Nursing Advanced Competency-based Training for Intensive Care (INACTIC) collaboration is a set of core competencies for advanced practice Intensive Care Unit (ICU) nurses across Europe. Some European countries, such as the UK, have identified such competencies, however, these advanced practice roles are rarely practiced across the rest of Europe. The INACTIC competencies were developed with an expert panel of 184 ICU nurses from 20 countries. It is also important to examine what patients and relatives with experience of intensive care felt about these competencies.   Aim To examine the views of recovered ICU patients and relatives regarding the INACTIC competencies. Methods Three patient and relative focus groups were conducted in England (n=5), Scotland (n=4) and Greece (n=4) to discuss a lay version of the INACTIC competencies. Discussions were open ended, followed a topic guide, recorded and transcribed verbatim. Analysis followed a conventional thematic approach, with the findings discussed iteratively among the authors. Results The feedback from across the focus groups resulted in three themes: 1) the importance of nurses being empowered to advocate for the patient; 2) the centrality of communication; and, 3) the impact of variability in ICU practices. There was a notable difference with the Greek focus group; because of restricted family visiting policies, relatives did not feel encouraged to participate in patient care. Conclusions The perspectives of patients and relatives largely aligned with the consensus of the INACTIC expert panel. Local differences in ICU experience highlight the changes that some ICUs would need to make for the INACTIC competencies to be embedded.
ISSN:2816-9050
2816-9050
DOI:10.29173/ijcc49