Evaluating the Impact of Basic Science Elective Modules: Medical Students' Perspective

Introduction: Elective courses are important in undergraduate medical education worldwide. Nevertheless, there hasn't been enough research done on the role that optional courses play, especially regarding the vertical integration of basic science courses like physiology with clinical courses. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inInternational journal of anatomy and research Vol. 12; no. 3; pp. 9003 - 9010
Main Authors Puja, Dulloo, Minal, Patel, Neeraj, Vedi, Ami, Panchal, Sunil, Chhajwani, Nimit V, Khara
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 05.09.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Introduction: Elective courses are important in undergraduate medical education worldwide. Nevertheless, there hasn't been enough research done on the role that optional courses play, especially regarding the vertical integration of basic science courses like physiology with clinical courses. Thus, more investigation is required to assess the significance and advantages of elective courses in the physiology basic science department. The study aims to assess the perception of students for the conduct of integrative elective modules within the Department of Physiology. Methods: Final-year medical students participated in a 60-hour, ten-day module focused on respiratory rehabilitation. The module included interactive lectures, case-based discussions, and clinical discussions on patients with skills related to Lung anatomy, Chest X-rays, pulmonary function tests, flow volume loops, arterial blood gas analysis, and yogic breathing techniques. The feedback was provided for assessment and taken for the module. Results: The final grades for the pupils varied from 74% to 90%. Interest and motivation for elective, Perceived Clinical, teaching, patient care benefits, enhanced learning, teamwork, collaboration, revisiting curriculum, and teaching were the themes identified in the thematic analysis of the student's perceptions of the elective module. Conclusion: The study revealed improved clinical interpretation for chest X-rays, pulmonary function tests, and critical care, as well as a rise in pre-clinical and clinical departments' interest in working together to address respiratory system topics. Though it will be too soon to determine the optional program's end conclusion, it is still a smart idea to move forward with. KEYWORDS: Medical Education, Undergraduate Students, Elective Courses, Vertical Integration, Physiology Education.
ISSN:2321-8967
2321-4287
DOI:10.16965/ijar.2024.158