Association of bevacizumab-free interval with efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

Abstract only 610 Background: Both bevacizumab (Bev) and anti-EGFR agents are sequentially used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Some basic studies reported the interaction between Bev and anti-EGFR agents in vivo. Therefore we hypothesized the shorter Bev-free interval may lead to poor outc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 32; no. 3_suppl; p. 610
Main Authors Komori, Azusa, Taniguchi, Hiroya, Narita, Yukiya, Uegaki, Shiori, Nitta, Sohhei, Yamaguchi, Kazuhisa, Nomura, Motoo, Kadowaki, Shigenori, Takahari, Daisuke, Ura, Takashi, Andoh, Masashi, Muro, Kei
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.01.2014
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only 610 Background: Both bevacizumab (Bev) and anti-EGFR agents are sequentially used for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Some basic studies reported the interaction between Bev and anti-EGFR agents in vivo. Therefore we hypothesized the shorter Bev-free interval may lead to poor outcome of anti-EGFR therapy. The aim of this study is to examine the association of the interval between last Bev administration and initial anti-EGFR agents with efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive mCRC patients who underwent combination therapy of anti-EGFR agents and irinotecan after failure of fluoropyrimidines, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and Bev at a single institution. We divided patients in two groups (group A: the interval between Bev and anti-EGFR agents <6M, group B: ≥6M). Results: A total of 114 patients constituted the cohort of analysis. The median age was 63; 78 (68%) patients were male. Most patients (N=100, 88%) were treated with cetuximab, and 14 patients were panitumumab. Seventy-four patients were group A and 40 patients group B, respectively. There was no significant difference in patient characteristics. Response rate was 24.7% in group A, and 50.0% in group B (p=0.0072). The patients in group B have significantly longer progression free survival (4.2 vs. 6.6 M, HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.43- 0.98, p=0.042) and longer overall survival (11.6 vs. 14.3 M, HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.39- 0.97, p=0.038). Conclusions: The short interval (<6M) between last Bev and anti-EGFR agents may interfere with the efficacy of anti-EGFR therapy.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/jco.2014.32.3_suppl.610