Risk factors associated with liver cancer in all US participants

e16276 Background: Liver cancer incidence rates have risen in recent years, more than tripled since 1980, and the liver cancer-caused death rates have more than doubled during the same time. The objective of this research was to identify significant risk factors (both genetic and environmental) that...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 42; no. 16_suppl; p. e16276
Main Authors Xiong, Chenxi, Su, Jing, Dong, X Charlie
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.06.2024
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:e16276 Background: Liver cancer incidence rates have risen in recent years, more than tripled since 1980, and the liver cancer-caused death rates have more than doubled during the same time. The objective of this research was to identify significant risk factors (both genetic and environmental) that may contribute to the liver cancer development. Methods: The study cohort was obtained from the All of Us (AoU) population with the latest data (data cutoff date 07/01/22) of 413,457 participants. The baseline survey data, genomics data, and electronic medical data have been queried for studying the risk factors to the liver cancer. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, AUDIT-C score (positive score, defined as > = 5 for men and > = 4 for women, was considered as with high risk of alcoholic hepatitis), social determinants of health (SDoH), and genetic variants were evaluated using the logistic regression models respecting the prevalence of liver cancer. Results: The study cohort included total 254,356 participants with their EMR data, genomics data, and AUDIT-C answers (median age 55 years, 61% women, 45% from minority groups, 19% Hispanics). Among them, 1,048 patients were diagnosed liver cancer. Using the logistic regression models, SDoHs showed association with the development of liver cancer. Retired groups demonstrated higher risk (adjusted odds ratio or aOR: 1.34, 95%CI:1.09-1.67) as well as the unemployed groups (aOR: 1.19, 95%CI: 0.98-1.46). C > G variants at 22:43928847 (aOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 1-1.39), G > G variants at 22:43937814 (aOR: 1.35, 95%CI: 0.97-1.82), and G > A variants at 22:43932850 (aOR: 1.18, 95%CI: 0.99-1.39) of gene PNPLA3 were associated with higher risks. C > T variants at 19:19268740 of gene TM6SF2 demonstrated higher risks (aOR: 1.23, 95%CI: 0.97-1.54) as well. The following demographic and comorbidities factors significantly contributed to the development of liver cancer: 45 to 65 age group (aOR: 6.89, 95%CI: 4.05-13), greater than 65 (aOR: 9.99, 95%CI: 5.84-18.91), hepatitis c virus infection (aOR: 12.46, 95%CI: 10.51-14.75), diabetes with chronic complications (aOR: 1.49, 95%CI: 1.25-1.78 ), diabetes without chronic complications (aOR: 1.81, 95%CI: 1.53-1.2.14). Conclusions: This study reveals that multiple risk factors are significantly associated with the liver cancer ranging from common genetic variants, socioeconomic conditions, age, viral infection, and diabetes. Thus, it is very important to take a comprehensive approach for the liver cancer prevention.
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2024.42.16_suppl.e16276