Effect of food on exposure to napabucasin: Data from two phase I studies
Abstract only 477 Background: Napabucasin is an orally-administered NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1–bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including STAT3. Methods: Food effects on napabucasin pharmacokinetics were evaluated in two studies: o...
Saved in:
Published in | Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 39; no. 3_suppl; p. 477 |
---|---|
Main Authors | , , , , , |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | English |
Published |
20.01.2021
|
Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
Summary: | Abstract only
477
Background: Napabucasin is an orally-administered NAD(P)H quinone dehydrogenase 1–bioactivatable investigational agent hypothesized to affect multiple oncogenic cellular pathways including STAT3. Methods: Food effects on napabucasin pharmacokinetics were evaluated in two studies: one at two sites in Japan (Study 1; JapicCTI-205447) and the other at two sites in the US and three in Canada (Study 2; NCT01775423). Study 1 enrolled healthy Japanese male volunteers (HJMV) who received napabucasin 480 mg (formula 2) per sequential design — fasting on Day (D) 1 followed by a Japanese diet (JD) on D8 — with a 6-D intervening washout. In Study 2, patients (pts) with advanced malignancies received napabucasin 500 mg (formula 1) on D1 in the fasted state, then napabucasin 500 mg (formula 2) on D4 and D8 with a high-fat breakfast [HFB] or in the fasted state per the randomized sequence per crossover design. Results: In Study 1, mean plasma napabucasin levels 6–10 h after napabucasin 480 mg administration were higher in fed (JD) vs fasted states; in the fed state, C
max
increased by 15% and AUC
last
by ~60% (Table), while t
max
decreased by ~1.4 hours. Adverse events (AEs) in Study 1 occurred in 5/6 (83.3%) HJMVs (fasted, n=3; fed, n=5; all grade [gr] 1). In Study 2, mean concentration profiles were comparable in fasted and fed (HFB) states for napabucasin 500 mg. When comparing fasted and fed states, C
max
increased by 21% and AUC
last
by 39% in the fed state (Table). Interpatient variability was high: geometric CV% for CL/F was 75.9% (fed) and 141% (fasted). AEs in Study 2 occurred in 68% (17/25) of fasted pts (gr 1: n=7; gr 2: n=8; gr 3, n=2) and 50% (7/14) of pts fed an HFB (gr 1: n=2; gr 2: n=3; gr 3, n=2). Conclusions: In HJMVs, napabucasin 480 mg administered with a JD increased exposure (C
max
; AUC
last
; AUC
inf
) and decreased t
max
vs the fasted state. In pts with advanced malignancies, napabucasin 500 mg administered with an HFB increased exposure (C
max
; AUC
last
) vs the fasted state. These exposure increases are not considered to be of clinical relevance. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-205447; NCT01775423. [Table: see text] |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0732-183X 1527-7755 |
DOI: | 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.477 |