Efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim in prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients

Abstract only e12511 Background: The role of secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (brand name: Jinyouli) in Chinese breast cancer patients has not been fully evaluated. We assessed the efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim in secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast can...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 38; no. 15_suppl; p. e12511
Main Authors Xia, Wen, Xu, Fei, Yuan, Zhongyu, Xu, Ruilian, Jiang, Yi, Wu, Zhiyong, Lu, Qianyi, Zheng, Qiufan, Hong, Ruoxi, Jiang, Kuikui, Huang, Jiajia, An, Xin, Bi, XiWen, Hong, Yun, Pang, Danmei, Zhang, Anqin, Wang, Xianming, Zhang, Qing, Zhang, Haibo, Wang, Shusen
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.05.2020
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only e12511 Background: The role of secondary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (brand name: Jinyouli) in Chinese breast cancer patients has not been fully evaluated. We assessed the efficacy and safety of pegfilgrastim in secondary prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in breast cancer patients. Methods: In the open-label, single-arm, multicenter trail, 319 patients were enrolled. Breast cancer patients who developed grades 3/4 neutropenia in the previous chemotherapy cycle were given a fixed dose of subcutaneous pegfilgrastim, 24-48 hours after receiving the same chemotherapy regimen in the subsequent cycle. A dose of 6mg/cycle was given to patients weighed ≥45kg, and a dose of 3mg/cycle was given to patients weighed <45kg. The primary end point was the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia and secondary end point was the incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN). Results: In patients who received prophylactic pegfilgrastim, the incidence of grade 3/4 neutropenia was reduced to 12.53% (95% CI, 9.1 to 16.7) and the incidence of FN was reduced from 6.58% (95% CI, 4.1 to 9.9) in the screening cycle to 0.94% (95% CI, 0.2 to 2.7)(Table). Among the 40 patients who still developed grades 3/4 neutropenia after receiving pegfilgrastim, the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was not significantly different between patients with (n=10) or without (n=30) additional filgrastim treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) associated with pegfilgrastim were bone pain and myalgia, which were prevalent in 10% to 15% of the patients. However, both AEs were mild or moderate (grades 1/2). Conclusions: Prophylactic administration of pegfilgrastim is effective and safe in reducing the risk of grades 3/4 neutropenia and FN in breast cancer patients after receiving chemotherapy. [Table: see text]
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.e12511