Real-world clinical burden of aggressive disease (AD) in advanced/metastatic non small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)

Abstract only e20723 Background: Clinical trials have shown that aNSCLC patients (pts) with AD, including those with rapid disease progression (RDP) on initial therapy (time to progression ≤ 12 weeks), have poor prognosis. This retrospective study evaluates the real world clinical burden associated...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of clinical oncology Vol. 37; no. 15_suppl; p. e20723
Main Authors Batus, Marta, Stefaniak, Victoria Jennifer, Molife, Cliff, Clarke, Jeffrey Melson, Winfree, Katherine B., Mitchell, Lucy, Cui, Zhanglin Lin, Bonomi, Philip D.
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.05.2019
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only e20723 Background: Clinical trials have shown that aNSCLC patients (pts) with AD, including those with rapid disease progression (RDP) on initial therapy (time to progression ≤ 12 weeks), have poor prognosis. This retrospective study evaluates the real world clinical burden associated with AD, defined as the difference in clinical effectiveness outcomes during subsequent treatment following RDP v non-RDP on platinum-based (Pt) therapy. Methods: Adult aNSCLC pts receiving standard post-Pt progression therapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors, single agent chemo, ramucirumab) between 03/01/2015 and 06/30/2018, after Pt therapy, with ≥ 3 months of potential follow up, were identified in the Flatiron EHR-derived deidentified database and assigned to RDP (n = 158) and non-RDP (n = 518) cohorts. Real-world tumor response (rwTR) was collected using technology-enabled abstraction. Overall survival (OS) from start of 1L, and real-world (rw) progression free survival (PFS) & rw tumor response outcomes (rw objective response rate [rwORR], rw disease control rate [rwDCR], rw time to first response [rwTTFR], rw duration of response [rwDOR] & rw best response [rwBR]) during post-Pt progression therapy were estimated. Results: Of 676 eligible pts, 23% had RDP. Clinical outcomes in the RDP and non-RDP cohorts are shown in table. Conclusions: Findings from this real world cohort underscore the clinical burden & unmet medical need for more effective treatment strategies in pts with aggressive aNSCLC pts who rapidly progress on initial therapy. As the treatment landscape evolves, characterization of these pts is warranted to identify potential risk factors. [Table: see text]
ISSN:0732-183X
1527-7755
DOI:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e20723