Real-world characterization of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients (pts) with rapid disease progression (RDP)

• Published in: Journal of clinical oncology Vol. 37; no. 15_suppl; p. e20706
• Main Authors: Gutierrez, Martin, Molife, Cliff, Belli, Andrew J., Hansen, Eric, Stefaniak, Victoria Jennifer, Winfree, Katherine B., Cui, Zhanglin Lin, Batus, Marta, Clarke, Jeffrey Melson, Narayanan, Viraj, Manion, Chelsea, Norden, Andrew David, Bonomi, Philip D.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 20.05.2019
• ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755
• DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.e20706

Abstract only e20706 Background: Despite advances in therapy, recent observational data shows that aNSCLC pts with RDP continue to have a poor prognosis. This retrospective, observational study characterizes the demographic, molecular, & treatment profile of pts with RDP. Methods: Adult aNSCLC pts receiving first-line (1L) platinum-based (Pt) therapy between 01/2014 - 12/2018 were identified in the COTA Real-World Evidence database and assigned to RDP (n = 280) & non-RDP (n = 1,212) cohorts based on time to progression during 1L Pt therapy (≤ 12 and > 12 weeks, respectively). Results: Of 1,492 eligible pts, the incidence of RDP was 19%. Mean age (±SD) was 64.6 (10.9) and 66.1 (10.2) in the RDP and non-RDP group, respectively (p = 0.04). Data showed RDP patients had higher percentage of stage IV disease at diagnosis (77 v 72, p < 0.01), higher histologic grade G3/G4 (37 v 29, p = 0.01), and PD-L1 negative (< 1% expression) status (p = 0.01). Table shows molecular profiling across cohorts. No notable difference in treatment patterns across 1L and 2L was observed. Conclusions: This study identifies stage IV disease at diagnosis, higher grade, & PD-L1 negative ( < 1% expression) as potential risk factors for RDP. A better understanding of this poor prognosis cohort may offer an opportunity to better optimize therapies & outcomes. [Table: see text]