Abstract P539: Comparison of Transradial Artery versus Transfemoral Artery Access for Solumbra Technique in Mechanical Thrombectomy

• Published in: Stroke (1970) Vol. 52; no. Suppl_1
• Main Authors: Nisar, Taha, Patel, Jimmy, Memon, Muhammad Z, Singla, Amit, Khandelwal, Priyank
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.03.2021
• ISSN: 0039-2499; 1524-4628
• DOI: 10.1161/str.52.suppl_1.P539

Abstract only Introduction: Solumbra technique involves the simultaneous use of stent-retriever and large-bore aspiration for clot retrieval in mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare various time parameters in patients who undergo MT via solumbra technique via transradial artery (TRA) approach vs. transfemoral artery (TRF) approach. Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MT via solumbra technique for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion at a comprehensive stroke center from 7/2014 to 5/2020. We compared time to recanalization parameters, score of TICI≥2b, and functional independence (3-month mRS≤2) in patients who underwent MT via TRA vs.TRF approach via the solumbra technique. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, pre-treatment-NIHSS, type of anesthesia (general vs.moderate), laterality, and clot location [proximal (internal carotid or M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery) vs.distal (M2 or M3 segment of the middle cerebral artery)]. Results: A total of 98 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 63.59±14.40 years. 18 (18.37%) patients underwent MT through transradial approach. In our cohort, there was a significant association of TRA with shorter angio suite arrival-time to puncture-time (22.12±9.92mins vs.28.83±12.26mins; OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1; P 0.026), but not with puncture-time to recanalization-time (84.34±61.34mins vs.63.73±35.29mins; OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1-1.03; P 0.085), angio suite arrival-time to recanalization-time (103.12±51.29mins vs.93.42±39.08mins; OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 1-1.02; P 0.524), number of passes to recanalization (1.78±1.36 vs.1.68±1.05; OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.66-1.63 ; P 0.899), number of patients with TICI≥2b (83.34% vs.91.25%; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.14-3.4; P 0.633), and functional independence (66.67% vs.78.75%; OR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.13-1.86; P 0.292), when compared to TRF approach for MT using solumbra technique. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates a significant association between TRA approach with shorter angio suite arrival-time to puncture-time but not with overall time to recanalization, number of patients with TICI≥2b, and functional independence, when compared to TRF approach for MT using solumbra technique.