Abstract 12848: Patient-Specific in silico Models Demonstrate Hemodynamic Effect of LAMPOON in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement

Abstract only Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic impact of LAMPOON (Laceration of the Anterior Mitral leaflet to Prevent Outflow ObstructioN) in transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using patient-specific in silico modeling. Methods: Eight subjects fr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 144; no. Suppl_1
Main Authors Kohli, Keshav, Wei, Zhenglun Alan, Perdoncin, Emily, Sadri, Vahid, Siefert, Andrew W, Blanke, Philipp, Greenbaum, Adam, Khan, Jaffar, Lederman, Robert, Babaliaros, Vasilis, Yoganathan, Ajit P, Oshinski, John N
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 16.11.2021
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only Introduction: The purpose of this study was to investigate the hemodynamic impact of LAMPOON (Laceration of the Anterior Mitral leaflet to Prevent Outflow ObstructioN) in transcatheter mitral valve replacement (TMVR) using patient-specific in silico modeling. Methods: Eight subjects from the LAMPOON investigational device exemption trial were included. All subjects were at prohibitive risk of outflow tract obstruction from TMVR based on computed tomography (CT), and underwent successful LAMPOON immediately followed by TMVR. A validated computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was used to compare simulated hemodynamics and 3D flow patterns between two modeled conditions: 1) TMVR with LAMPOON and 2) TMVR without LAMPOON. Using the post-procedure CT scans, anatomical models of TMVR with LAMPOON were created for each subject. The open transcatheter valve cells were then virtually closed to model TMVR without LAMPOON for each subject. Finally, CFD was performed for each condition to simulate the systolic flow fields. Results: As compared to TMVR without LAMPOON, TMVR with LAMPOON resulted in lower peak velocity, lower peak LVOT gradient, and higher peak LVOT effective orifice area by 13 ± 6% (p=0.004), 28 ± 14% (p=0.008), and 15 ± 8% (p=0.002), respectively. LAMPOON provided flow communication through exposed cells of the transcatheter valve, thereby decreasing the flow constriction and reducing flow stasis in the vicinity of the neo-LVOT (Figure). The hemodynamic benefit of LAMPOON was observed to be greater in subjects with a smaller neo-LVOT area measured post-implant (p<0.001). Conclusions: In silico modeling allowed for a quantitative patient-specific comparison of TMVR with and without LAMPOON, which is impossible to study clinically. The LAMPOON procedure improved simulated hemodynamics in all subjects, with a greater hemodynamic impact observed in subjects with a smaller post-implant neo-LVOT area.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.12848