Abstract 105: Accuracy of Team Perception of Performance With Actual CPR Quality Metrics in Children

Abstract only Background: American Heart Association (AHA) recommends high quality CPR to promote optimal patient outcomes. Few reports compare team members’ perceptions of CPR quality with quantitative CPR data during actual pediatric CPR. Hypothesis: Self-reported team perception of CPR performanc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 138; no. Suppl_2
Main Authors Knight, Lynda, Sweberg, Todd, Mullan, Pual, Sen, Anita, Braga, Matthew, Jani, Priti, Su, Felice, Balikai, Shlipa, Kessler, David, Roberts, Joan, Donoghue, Aaron, Wenger, Jesse, Niles, Dana, Nadkarni, Vinay, Berg, Marc
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 06.11.2018
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only Background: American Heart Association (AHA) recommends high quality CPR to promote optimal patient outcomes. Few reports compare team members’ perceptions of CPR quality with quantitative CPR data during actual pediatric CPR. Hypothesis: Self-reported team perception of CPR performance will not meet quantitative CPR metrics using AHA BLS guideline criteria. Methods: Prospective data from an international pediatric (pediRES-Q) resuscitation collaborative from February 2016 to August 2017. A modified Team Emergency Assessment Measure framework for qualitative content analysis was used to assess data from “hot” debriefings (held soon after arrest) by language processing experts blinded to CPR data. Events without reported perception of CPR and quantitative CPR data were excluded. Comments regarding CPR perception were grouped as either Plus perceptions of performance (PPP) or Delta perceptions of performance (DPP). Grouped events were matched and compared to quantitative CPR data of chest compression (CC) fraction (CCF), rate, and depth as collected by CPR-recording defibrillators. Compliance with AHA BLS guidelines were defined as events with mean: CCF >60%, CC rate 100-120/min; and CC depth for infants <1yo, ~4 cm (3.6-4.4 cm.); children 1-18 yo, 5-≤6 cm. Results: Of 227 arrests, 108 (48%) hot debriefings were reported. Reported CPR perceptions with paired quantitative CPR data were available for 53/108 (49%) events; 32/53 (60%) PPP and 21/53 (39%) DPP. Event CPR metric summaries (median [IQR]) for PPP - CCF 0.87 [0.77, 0.93]; CC rate 116/min [108.5, 120]; CC depth age <1yo 2.35 [2.01, 3.0] cm; >1yr 4.2 [3.3, 5.05] cm. DPP - CCF 0.79 [0.69, 0.92]; CC rate 118/min [109,129]; CC depth < 1 yo 2.03 [1.95, 2.2] cm; >1yo 3.93 [3.3, 5.06] cm. PPP events, 28/32 (87%) met guideline criteria for CCF, 25/32 (78%) for CC rate; 6/32 (19%) for CC depth; and 4/32 (12%) met criteria for all 3 categories. For DPP events, 17/21 (80%) met guideline criteria for CCF; 15/21 (71%) for CC rate; and 3/21 (15%) for CC depth, and 2/21 (9%) met criteria for all 3 categories. Conclusions: Self-reported team perception of CPR quality does not match quantitative CPR metrics using AHA guideline criteria whether CPR was positively perceived or not, depth being main reason for non-compliance.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.138.suppl_2.105