Abstract 18891: Prospective Evaluation of Diagnostic Performance and Safety of Implementing a Biventricular Approach for Endomyocardial Biopsy in Patients With Suspected Myocarditis

Abstract only Background: Previous retrospective analyses have suggested that biventricular (BV) endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is superior to right (RV) or left ventricular (LV) EMB only in diagnosing patients with suspected myocarditis. Aim: To prospectively assess the feasibility, safety and diagnos...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 130; no. suppl_2
Main Authors Lurz, Philipp, Foehrenbach, Felix, Luecke, Christian, Urban, Daniel, Boudriot, Enno, Thiele, Holger, Desch, Steffen, Klingel, Karin, Kandolf, Reinhard, Schuler, Gerhard
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 25.11.2014
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only Background: Previous retrospective analyses have suggested that biventricular (BV) endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) is superior to right (RV) or left ventricular (LV) EMB only in diagnosing patients with suspected myocarditis. Aim: To prospectively assess the feasibility, safety and diagnostic yield of BV EMB in consecutive patients with suspected myocarditis. Methods: Five to six EMBs were taken from the RV and LV under fluoroscopic guidance. Biopsies were analyzed in a core lab by highly experienced investigators (KK, RK) Myocarditis/myocardial in[[Unable to Display Character: fl]]ammation was de[[Unable to Display Character: fi]]ned as the detection of ≥14 infiltrating leukocytes/mm2 (CD3 T-lymphocytes and/or CD68 macrophages) in addition to enhanced HLA class II expression in professional antigen-presenting immune cells. Results: 100 consecutive patients (mean age 44 ± 15 years) with clinically suspected myocarditis were included. RV EMB was attempted in 100 patients, in 3 the procedure was abandoned due to unsatisfying positioning on the guiding catheter, in 1/97 RV EMBs were inadequate with no myocardial tissue obtained. LV EMB was attempted in 97 patients, in 3, LV EMB was not performed due to presence of LV thrombi, in 1/97 patient LV EMBs were inadequate with no myocardial tissue obtained. Major complication rate for LV EMB was 0% and for RV EMB, 1% (pericardial tamponade requiring surgical revision). Results of adequate BV EMBs were analyzed in 92 patients. On BV EMB, myocarditis was diagnosed in 61/92 patients. When considering LV EMB only, the diagnosis would have been missed in 3/61, when considering RV EMB only in 7/61 patients. Conclusion: BV EMB is feasible and safe in the majority of patients with suspected myocarditis and yields in a superior diagnostic performance as compared to a single ventricle EMBs.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.130.suppl_2.18891