Abstract 18876: Increased Tricuspid Regurgitation after Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Device Implantation is Associated with Reduced Likelihood of Left Ventricular Reverse Remodeling

Abstract only Background: Increased tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a potential consequence of pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion. We examined the association between increased TR following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation and left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inCirculation (New York, N.Y.) Vol. 126; no. suppl_21
Main Authors Shin, John H, Metzl, Mark D, Hansen, James C, Lazar, Sorin, Tsai, Kevin, Rich, Jonathan D, Lang, Roberto M, Beshai, John F, Nayak, Hemal M, Burke, Martin C, Moss, Joshua D
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 20.11.2012
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Abstract only Background: Increased tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is a potential consequence of pacemaker and defibrillator lead insertion. We examined the association between increased TR following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation and left ventricular (LV) reverse remodeling. Methods: Patients who underwent de-novo CRT-D device implantation at our institution from 2003 to 2011 with available baseline and follow-up echocardiograms were included in this retrospective analysis. Pre- and post-operative echocardiograms were evaluated for change in degree of TR and evidence of LV reverse remodeling. TR was graded as absent (0), minimal (0.5), mild (1), mild-moderate (1.5), moderate (2), moderate-severe (2.5), or severe (3), and the numeric change in TR grade pre- and post-CRT implantation was determined. LV reverse remodeling was defined as an absolute improvement in LV ejection fraction (EF) ≥5%, a relative reduction in LV end diastolic dimension ≥10%, or improvement in mitral regurgitation ≥1 full grade. Results: A total of 101 patients were included. Median time to post-operative echocardiogram was 8.5 months, with an interquartile range of 4.7-15.1 months. Seventeen patients (17%) developed ≥1 full grade increase in TR post CRT-D. Only four of the 17 (24%) with ≥1 full grade increase in TR had evidence of LV reverse remodeling, compared with 46 of 84 (55%) with <1 full grade increase (p = 0.031). In multivariate analysis, increase in TR post-device implant by ≥ 1 grade, baseline EF ≥ 35%, absence of baseline left bundle branch block, and male gender were independently associated with reduced likelihood of LV reverse remodeling. Conclusions: In patients undergoing de-novo CRT-D implantation for standard indications, increased TR of ≥ 1 full grade after device implantation is independently associated with a reduced likelihood of LV reverse remodeling. Prospective studies are needed to determine if lead-related TR adversely impacts response to CRT.
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.126.suppl_21.A18876