Preparation of Ni-Sn Alloy Nanorods with Composition Gradient, and Its Effect on Li-Ion Battery Anode Performance

• Published in: Meeting abstracts (Electrochemical Society) Vol. MA2014-04; no. 2; p. 399
• Main Authors: Chowdhury, Ridwanur Rahman, Hoffman, Lance Raymond, Kaule, Joseph Matthew, Mukaibo, Hitomi
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 10.06.2014
• ISSN: 2151-2043; 2151-2035
• DOI: 10.1149/MA2014-04/2/399

The development of Li-ion batteries (LIBs) with high capacity, fast charge/discharge rates and long lifecycle is indispensable for the advancement of high power portable devices, plug-in hybrid and electric vehicles, and renewable energies. Novel anode materials that offer higher specific capacity than that of conventional carbon-based materials are considered a key factor in this development. Numerous Li-alloying materials are being investigated, but they experience large volume changes during the lithiation/delithiation process, leading directly to electrode degradation and short battery life. Tamura et al. have demonstrated that a concentration gradient at the interface between the active material and the current collector can enhance the interface strength and lead to longer lifecycle [1]. Our research involves investigating how this anode degradation may be avoided by creating a gradient of stress within the anode. We hypothesize that allowing the volume change of anodes to occur gradually within its structure will result in less pulverization and longer cycle life. In this presentation, we report our studies on this approach using an array of Ni-Sn alloy nanorods as the model system. Sn is one of the most promising anode materials, with high theoretical specific capacity, low cost, high abundance and high electrical conductivity. The Li-inactive Ni acts as a matrix to buffer the volume expansion during the alloying process [2]. The nanorod array structure allows us to easily incorporate a 1-dimensional stress gradient into the structure by changing the Ni/Sn ratio of the nanorod along its length, making it an ideal simplified platform to study the stress gradient effect. In our work, we use the well-known template synthesis method to construct the Ni-Sn alloy nanorod array. Briefly, the array was prepared by electrodepositing Ni-Sn alloy into the pores of commercially available polycarbonate (PC) filter membranes, and later exposing the deposits by removal of the PC membrane. Electrodeposition allows control of the composition of the Ni-Sn deposits via the current density [3]. Table 1 shows how the composition changed when Ni-Sn alloy nanorod arrays were fabricated by applying two different current densities. We found that a higher current density (10 mA/cm 2 ) resulted in a lower Sn content than a lower current density (1.25 mA/cm 2 ). Fig. 1a shows the FE-SEM image of the surface of the PC membrane used. The pore diameters were ~0.1μm, as indicated by the manufacturer. Figure 1b shows a representative image of the deposited Ni-Sn alloy nanorods, after dissolving the PC membrane away. The figure indicates that the nanorod size is consistent with the pore diameter of the PC membrane. The Ni-Sn was deposited under 10mA/cm 2 for the first 12 minutes, and then at 1.25mA/cm 2 for the next 80 minutes, to vary the Ni-Sn composition within the nanorods. In the presentation, we will discuss the elemental distribution and crystal structure of the Ni-Sn nanorods with various composition gradients using TEM-EDX mapping and XRD. We will also present the electrochemical properties and the Li-ion anode property of these nanorods, through cyclic voltammetry and cycle performance studies. Table 1 Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDX) results of Ni-Sn alloy nanorod array samples prepared under two different current densities. Current Density Sn Atomic % Ni Atomic % 10mA/cm 2 50 % 50 % 1.25mA/cm 2 61 % 39 % References [1] N. Tamura, R. Ohshita, M. Fujimoto, S. Fujitani, M. Kamino,J. Power Sources 107 (2002) 48-55. [2] H. Mukaibo, T. Sumi, T. Yokoshima, T. Osaka, Electrochem. Solid-State Lett. 6 (2003) A218. [3] V.D Joviæ, U. Laènjevac, B.M. Joviæ, L. Karanoviæ, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 37 (2012) 17882-17891.