Regional Authority, Transnational Lobbying and the Allocation of Structural Funds in the E uropean U nion

The allocation of E uropean U nion ( EU ) structural funds is subject to fierce regional lobbying. This article examines the extent to which regions with greater political authority are better able to lobby for funds than their weaker counterparts. Existing research acknowledging the importance of r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published inJournal of common market studies Vol. 51; no. 5; pp. 815 - 831
Main Author Chalmers, Adam William
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 01.09.2013
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0021-9886
1468-5965
DOI10.1111/jcms.12038

Cover

More Information
Summary:The allocation of E uropean U nion ( EU ) structural funds is subject to fierce regional lobbying. This article examines the extent to which regions with greater political authority are better able to lobby for funds than their weaker counterparts. Existing research acknowledging the importance of regional authority in these processes has used inadequate indicators. This analysis, drawing on the R egional A uthority I ndex, is the first to use regional‐level data disaggregating between regional authority as self‐rule and shared‐rule. It also uses data that measure the lobbying capacity of regions' Brussels‐based lobbying offices. Controlling for a battery of competing and control variables, Tobit regression analyses of 181 regions receiving funds in the 2007–13 period suggest that regional authority expressed as shared‐rule, but not self‐rule, has a significant impact on the allocation of structural funds in the EU .
ISSN:0021-9886
1468-5965
DOI:10.1111/jcms.12038