P-717 Add-ons availability and quality of online information provided by Brazilian IVF clinics

• Published in: Human reproduction (Oxford) Vol. 39; no. Supplement_1
• Main Authors: Bossi, R, Sampaio, M, Goulart, A C, Alvarenga, D, Carneiro, M
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 03.07.2024
• ISSN: 0268-1161; 1460-2350
• DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae108.1044

Abstract Study question How do Brazilian fertility clinic websites advertise four IVF add-ons: assistedhatching (AH), preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A), ERA and sperm DNA fragmentation test. Summary answer Available information, about ivf add-ons in Brazil, on researched websites is heterogeneous and is not evidence-based according to the last published recommendations. What is known already Over 1 billion people worldwide use online resources to obtain health-related information. People struggling with infertility are increasingly turning to online resources for infertility-related content and social support. “Add-on” procedures are actively promoted on some fertility clinic websites as means to improve IVF success rates. However, the actual contribution of these interventions to IVF success rates remains debatable. ESHRE has recently issued 42 recommendations were formulated on the use of add-ons in IVF. At present, no study has evaluated the type and quality of the information provided on the Brazilian IVF clinics’ websites regarding the merits of “add-ons. Study design, size, duration Prospective evaluation of the availability and quality of information on four common add-ons provided by IVF clinics in the southeast of Brazil between October-November 2023. Clinics were identified using the national registry (SisEmbrio) as well as through manual online search. As only public online available information was used no ethical approval was necessary. Statistical analyses were restricted to descriptive of the frequency of each add-on and frequency of claims made in relation to their use. Participants/materials, setting, methods One reviewer took screenshots of the included clinic pages and claims and a second reviewer double-checked everything. The folowing information was colletced: availability of of the four add-ons; information on the effectiveness on: implanation rate(IR), pregnancy rate (PR) or live-birth rate (LBR); information on the scientifc uncertainty of the use of add-on and possible negative impact; for PGT-A if the clinic informed that the data obtained should be confirmed by prenatal diagnostic testing. Main results and the role of chance The websites of 122 IVF clinics were included. Nine clinics had no website or were offline. PGT-A was the most frequent available add-on (n = 77; 68%) but only two of them (2,5%) informed on PR. There was no information on IR nor LBR. Thirteen clinics (16,8%) acknowledged it could have adeverse effects but only one mentioned the scientifc uncertainty related to its use. Forty (35%) websites displayed AH with 7 reporting on possible negative effects but none disclosed success rates (PR, IR or LBR). Eight clinics admitted AH had uncertain benefits and seven noted possible negative impact. The sperm DNA fragmentation test was presented in 37 (33%) websites but none reported on potential adverse effects nor success rates in terms of PR, IR nor LBR. No website provided information on the uncertainty of the benefit of the test. The ERA-test was advertised in 28 (25%) websites with no information on its benefits on sucess rates. Three clinics advised it could have a negative impact and six agreed its effectiveness was unclear. The cost was never pesented for any of the add-ons researched in accordance to national regulations. Of note, 36 websites advertised other add-ond such as MSOME, ZYMOT and endometrial scrathcing. Limitations, reasons for caution The study was restricted to 122 clinics websites in the southeast of Brazil. Evalaution was restricted to four commons add-ons and the quality of the information provided could not be assessed as the clinics follow no specific regulation on how to advertise scientifc information to their patiens and general public. Wider implications of the findings The information provided by Brazilian IVF clinics could be misleading. The use of add-ons is surrounded by scientific uncertainly related to their benefits and cost-effectiveness therfeore it is of utmost importance that clinics reviewt heir websites and offer sound scientific data to patients and the general public as well. Trial registration number Not applicable