Double dissociation of deficits in visuospatial memory and executive function in patients with major depression with and without ECT referral

• Published in: European psychiatry Vol. 26; no. S2; p. 1146
• Main Authors: Oulis, P., Kalogerakou, S., Papakosta, V.-M., Kontis, D., Theochari, E., Koutroumpi, M., Anyfandi, E., Michopoulos, I., Poulopoulou, C., Tsaltas, E.
• Format: Journal Article
• Language: English
• Published: 01.03.2011
• ISSN: 0924-9338; 1778-3585
• DOI: 10.1016/S0924-9338(11)72851-6

Introduction The pretreatment neuropsychological profile of drug-resistant patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) referred for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) may differ from that of their drug-respondent MDD counterparts. Such differences could help in identifying distinct MDD subtypes, thus offering insights into the neuropathology underlying differential treatment responses. Method Depressed patients with ECT referral (ECTs), depressed patients with no ECT referral (NECTs) and nonpsychiatric Controls (matched groups, n = 15) were assessed with memory and executive function tests from the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery (CANTAB). Results ECTs scored significantly lower than NECTs in the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; p = 0.01). NECTs performed worse than Controls in the Paired Associates Learning (PAL) task (p < 0.03 ; Control/NECT p < 0.01) and the Spatial Recognition Memory (SRM) task (p < 0.05 ; Controls/NECTs p < 0.05) ; ECTs performed between Controls and NECTs, not differing from either. In the Intra/Extradimensional (IED) set-shifting task, ECTs performed worse that Controls and NECTS (IED: p < 0.01 ; Controls/ECTs p < 0.01), particularly in the shift phases, which suggests reduced attentional flexibility. In Stockings of Cambridge (SOC), ECTs abandoned the test early more often than Controls and NECTs (H = 11, p < 0.01) but ECTs who completed SOC performed comparably to the other two groups. Conclusions A double dissociation emerged from the comparison of cognitive profiles of ECT and NECT patients. ECTs showed executive deficits, particularly in attentional flexibility, but mild deficits in tests of visuospatial memory. NECTs presented the opposite pattern. This suggests predominantly frontostriatal involvement in ECT versus temporal involvement in NECT dépressives.