Er：YAG激光联合引导骨组织再生术治疗种植体周围炎骨缺损的临床效果

目的评估Er：YAG激光（erbium-doped:yttriumaluminiumgarnet）联合引导骨组织再生术（guidedboneregeneration，GBR）治疗种植体周围炎骨缺损的临床效果。方法选择形成环形牙槽骨吸收的种植体周围牙周炎患者15例，共26颗患牙，按照随机照原则分为2组，试验组（14颗）采用Er：YAG激光联合GBR的方式治疗种植体周围骨缺损；对照组（12颗）采用机械刮治联合GBR治疗牙槽骨的缺损。在基线和6个月时进行临床牙周指标的检查测定，包括菌斑指数（plaqueindex，PI）、龈沟出血指数（sulcusbleedingindex，SBI）、牙周探诊深度（...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in口腔疾病防治 Vol. 25; no. 7; pp. 430 - 434
Main Author 卢海宾;万蕾;容明灯;张雪洋;苏媛
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 2017
Subjects
Er:YAG激光;引导骨组织再生术;种植体周围炎;骨缺损;临床附着丧失
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN2096-1456
2097-0234

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的评估Er：YAG激光（erbium-doped:yttriumaluminiumgarnet）联合引导骨组织再生术（guidedboneregeneration，GBR）治疗种植体周围炎骨缺损的临床效果。方法选择形成环形牙槽骨吸收的种植体周围牙周炎患者15例，共26颗患牙，按照随机照原则分为2组，试验组（14颗）采用Er：YAG激光联合GBR的方式治疗种植体周围骨缺损；对照组（12颗）采用机械刮治联合GBR治疗牙槽骨的缺损。在基线和6个月时进行临床牙周指标的检查测定，包括菌斑指数（plaqueindex，PI）、龈沟出血指数（sulcusbleedingindex，SBI）、牙周探诊深度（probingdepth，PD）及临床附着丧失（clinicalattachmentlost，CAL），并进行比较。结果2组术后PI、SBI、PD及CAL均较术前有明显改善（P<0.05）。术后2组PI均值都维持在一个较低的水平，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）；试验组与对照组的SBI分别为（0.8±0.2）、（1.1±0.2）；PD分别为（5.8±0.8）mm、（6.2±0.6）mm；CAL分别为（2.3±0.7）mm、（3.6±0.6）mm。组间比较差异均有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论Er：YAG激光联合GBR在治疗种植体周炎骨缺损具有较好的临床效果。
Bibliography:44-1724/R
Objective To evaluate the therapeutic effects of erbiumdoped:yttrium aluminium garnet laser(Er:YAG laser)combined with guided bone regeneration(GBR)in the treatment of periimplantitis bone defect.MethodsA total of26implants in15patients with periimplantitis were selected and divided into experimental group(14implants)and control group(12implants)randomly.The experimental group was treated with Er:YAG laser combinedwith GBR,and the control group was treated with mechanical curettage with GBR.Clinical periodontal index test including plaque index(PI),sulcus bleeding index(SBI),probing depth(PD)and clinical attachment level(CAL)werechecked at baseline,3months and6months.All the above data were statistically analyzed.Results All of the clinicalperiodontal index were improved after surgery.SBI,PD and CAL of the experimental group was0.8±0.2mm,5.8±0.8mm,and2.3±0.7mm,while they were1.1±0.2mm,6.2±0.6mm,and3.6±0.6mm in the control group.The experimental group showed better results than the control group(P<
ISSN:2096-1456
2097-0234