部分切除术与根治术治疗pT1bN0M0期肾癌的临床疗效对比
目的比较肾癌部分切除术(partial nephrectomy,PN)和肾癌根治术(radical nephrectomy,RN)治疗pT1bN0M0期肾癌的临床疗效及预后评估,为p T1b期肾癌的治疗选择提供参考。方法回顾性研究湖北省肿瘤医院从2004年1月至2010年12月诊断为pT1bN0M0的肾癌患者(PN=16例,RN=52例)。比较两组之间的5年总生存率(overall survival,OS),5年无复发生存率(recurrence-free survival,RFS),和5年癌症特异性生存率(cancer-specific survival,CSS)。同时收集了术前和术后肌酐和...
Saved in:
Published in | 肿瘤防治研究 Vol. 43; no. 10; pp. 883 - 886 |
---|---|
Main Author | |
Format | Journal Article |
Language | Chinese |
Published |
2016
|
Subjects | |
Online Access | Get full text |
ISSN | 1000-8578 |
Cover
Summary: | 目的比较肾癌部分切除术(partial nephrectomy,PN)和肾癌根治术(radical nephrectomy,RN)治疗pT1bN0M0期肾癌的临床疗效及预后评估,为p T1b期肾癌的治疗选择提供参考。方法回顾性研究湖北省肿瘤医院从2004年1月至2010年12月诊断为pT1bN0M0的肾癌患者(PN=16例,RN=52例)。比较两组之间的5年总生存率(overall survival,OS),5年无复发生存率(recurrence-free survival,RFS),和5年癌症特异性生存率(cancer-specific survival,CSS)。同时收集了术前和术后肌酐和肾小球滤过率(estimated glomerular filtration rate,e GFR)以评价肾功能的改变。结果 PN与RN的5年OS(90.3%vs.88.6%,P=0.552)、RFS(90.3%vs.75.4%,P=0.121)和CSS(90.3%vs.92.8%,P=0.875)方面差异均无统计学意义。而术后肾功能下降患者所占比例在PN组显著优于RN组(0 vs.12.6%,P〈0.01)。术后一年血肌酐和e GFR水平在RN组中要高于PN组[(0.3±0.6)vs.(0.2±0.1)、(20.1±12.6)vs.(9.8±12.1)],但是差异无统计学意义(P=0.115,P=0.064)。结论 PN或RN对于pT1bN0M0期肾癌的治疗在预后和安全性方面差异均无统计学意义,PN术后肾功能指标显著优于RN,PN是治疗p T1b期肾癌的一个可行方案。 |
---|---|
Bibliography: | 42-1241/R Objective To compare the clinical outcomes and prognosis of partial nephrectomy(PN) and radical nephrectomy(RN) on pT1bN0M0 renal cell carcinoma(RCC) patients, and to provide reference for treatment selection on p T1 b RCC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 68 patients(PN=16 cases, RN=52 cases) diagnosed as pT1bN0M0 RCC from January 2004 to December 2010 in Hubei Cancer Hospital. We compared the clinical outcomes including 5-year overall survival(OS), recurrence-free survival(RFS) and cancer-specific survival(CSS) between two groups. We also analyzed renal function by collecting creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate(e GFR) before and after the operation. Results The 5-year OS(90.3% vs. 88.6%, P=0.552), RFS(90.3% vs. 75.4%, P=0.121) and CSS(90.3% vs. 92.8%, P=0.875) between PN and RN groups were not significantly different. The number of patients with a decrease of renal function was fewer in the PN group than that in the RN group(0 vs. 12.6%, P〈0.01). However, the serum cr |
ISSN: | 1000-8578 |