深圳市南山区儿童家长口腔健康素养促进的干预效果评估

目的评估儿童和家长开展互动式工作坊干预措施对促进深圳市家长口腔健康素养(oral health literacy,OHL)的提高和儿童口腔保健行为(oral health behavior,OHB)改善的效果。方法比较干预前后工作坊干预组(A组)、平行对照组(B组)和空白对照组(C组)3组家长OHL得分和OHB得分的差异。结果与基线时相比,3个月后A组家长OHL得分(t=22.369,P〈0.001)和儿童OHB得分(t=31.100,P〈0.001)均明显上升;B组(OHL:t=1.892,P=0.061;OHB:t=1.965,P=0.052)、C组(OHL:t=1.567.P=0.120...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in口腔疾病防治 Vol. 24; no. 2; pp. 105 - 107
Main Author 李雪琦 陈思韩 余红兵 张婷
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 2016
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:目的评估儿童和家长开展互动式工作坊干预措施对促进深圳市家长口腔健康素养(oral health literacy,OHL)的提高和儿童口腔保健行为(oral health behavior,OHB)改善的效果。方法比较干预前后工作坊干预组(A组)、平行对照组(B组)和空白对照组(C组)3组家长OHL得分和OHB得分的差异。结果与基线时相比,3个月后A组家长OHL得分(t=22.369,P〈0.001)和儿童OHB得分(t=31.100,P〈0.001)均明显上升;B组(OHL:t=1.892,P=0.061;OHB:t=1.965,P=0.052)、C组(OHL:t=1.567.P=0.120;OHB:t=1.591,P=0.114)家长OHL和儿童OHB得分无明显改变。3组间家长OHL(F=131.590,P〈0.001)和OHB得分(F=203.784,P〈0.001)差异均具有统计学意义,进一步两两比较,A组干预前后家长OHL和儿童OHB得分的差值,与B组及C组比较,差异均有统计学意义。结论通过对儿童和家长开展互动式工作坊干预促进了家长OHL提高,且儿童OHB得到明显改善。
Bibliography:44-1724/R
Objective To assess the effectiveness of interactive workshop intervention measures between children and parents inonimproving oral health literacy of parents and oral health behavior of children. Methods We compared OHL and OHB score were compared among intervention group (A), parallel control group (B) and control group (C) before and after intervention. Results Compared with baseline, parents' OHL score (t = 22. 369, P 〈 0. 001) and OHB scores (t =31. 100, P 〈0.001) of intervention group were significantly increased 3 months later. Whereas parents' of parallel control group (OHL: t = 1. 892, P =0. 061; OHB: t = 1. 965, P =0. 052), blank control group ( OHL: t = 1.56, P =0. 120; OHB: t = 1. 591, P =0.114) had no significant changes, there were statistically significant differences among 3 groups of parents' OHL ( F = 131. 590, P 〈 0.001 ) and OHB score ( F = 203. 784, P 〈 0. 001) . Pairwise comparisons. There were statistically significant differences ( P 〈0.001) between OHL and OHB before and 'aft
ISSN:2096-1456
2097-0234