调三焦穴位埋线结合腹针治疗腹型肥胖的临床观察：随机对照研究（英文）

目的：观察采用调三焦理论指导下的穴位埋线疗法结合腹针治疗腹型肥胖症的临床疗效。方法：将120例腹型肥胖症患者用区组随机法分为穴位埋线组（A组）30例,腹针组（B组）30例,穴位埋线结合腹针组（C组）30例、空白对照组（D组）30例,前3组以调理三焦为原则,选中脘、天枢、阴交、支沟、关元、足三里穴,采用穴位埋线每7 d埋线1次,连续3次为1个疗程（A组）;腹针每3 d针刺1次,7次为1个疗程（B组）;两者结合方法治疗（C组）。结果：治疗后各组总疗效分别为46.7%、43.3%、76.7%、26.7%,差异具有统计学意义。腰围差值比较,穴位埋线结合腹针与穴位埋线比较P=0.54,无统计学意义,体质...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in世界针灸杂志：英文版 no. 4; pp. 29 - 34
Main Author 邓丽娟 伦志坚 马晓薇 周俊亮
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 2014
Subjects
埋线
肥胖
腹针
随机对照试验
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的：观察采用调三焦理论指导下的穴位埋线疗法结合腹针治疗腹型肥胖症的临床疗效。方法：将120例腹型肥胖症患者用区组随机法分为穴位埋线组（A组）30例,腹针组（B组）30例,穴位埋线结合腹针组（C组）30例、空白对照组（D组）30例,前3组以调理三焦为原则,选中脘、天枢、阴交、支沟、关元、足三里穴,采用穴位埋线每7 d埋线1次,连续3次为1个疗程（A组）;腹针每3 d针刺1次,7次为1个疗程（B组）;两者结合方法治疗（C组）。结果：治疗后各组总疗效分别为46.7%、43.3%、76.7%、26.7%,差异具有统计学意义。腰围差值比较,穴位埋线结合腹针与穴位埋线比较P=0.54,无统计学意义,体质量差值比较,穴位埋线结合腹针与A、B、D组比较为4.49±0.59 vs 2.64±0.53,2.87±0.44,1.45±0.26,均P〈0.05,差异有统计学意义。结论：穴位埋线结合腹针在治疗腹型肥胖总有效率方面效果最佳,在减少腰围方面与单纯穴位埋线疗效相当,降低体重方面疗效最佳。
Bibliography:DENG Li-juan,LUN Zhi-jian,MA Xiao-wei,ZHOU Jun-liang1. Department of TCM, Nanhai Women＇s and Children＇s Hospital Affiliated to Guangzhou University of CM, Foshan 528200, China; 2. Cancer Center of Sun Yat-Sen University
11-2892/R
Objective To observe the clinical effect of acupoint catgut embedding combined with abdominal acupuncture for treatment of abdominal obesity under the theoretical guidance of regulating the three energizer.Methods One hundred and twenty patients were randomly divided into acupoint catgut embedding group（group A）,abdominal acupuncture group（group B）,acupoint catgut embedding combined with abdominal acupuncture group（group C） and blank control group（group D） based on blocked random method,with 30 cases each;the first three groups based on the principle of regulating three energizer were respectively given acupoint catgut embedding at Zhongwan（中脘 CV12）,Tianshu（天枢 ST 25）,Yinjiao（阴交 CV 7）,Zhigou（支沟 TE 6）,Guanyuan（关元 CV 4）,Zusanli（足三里 ST 36） with catgut embedding once every 7 days,three times for each course of treatment,abdominal acupuncture once every3 days,seven times for each course of treatment.Results The therapeutic effect of each group after treatment was respectively 46.7%（14/30）,43.3%（13/30）,76.7%（23/30） and 26.7%（8/30）,with statistically significant difference.For comparison of waist circumference difference,there was no statistical significance between acupoint catgut embedding combined with abdominal acupuncture and acupoint catgut embedding group（P=0.54）,and for comparison of weight difference,there was statistical significance in terms of therapeutic effect between acupoint catgut embedding combined with abdominal acupuncture and A,B,D groups（4.49±0.59 vs 2.64±0.53,2.87±0.44,1.45±0.26,all P〈0.05）.Conclusion Acupoint catgut embedding combined with abdominal acupuncture had the best effect in terms of total effective rate for treatment of abdominal obesity,equivalent therapeutic effect to simple acupoint catgut embedding in terms of waist circumference reduction,and the best therapeutic effect in terms of weight reduction.
obesity; catgut embedding; abdominal acupuncture; randomized controlled trial（RCT）
ISSN:1003-5257