温针灸治疗60例腹泻型肠易激综合征疗效观察
目的：观察温针灸治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的临床疗效。方法：120例腹泻型肠易激综合征患者,随机分为温针灸组和西药组,每组各60例。温针灸组主穴取天枢、足三里、三阴交,采用温针灸,留针30 min,每日1次,治疗6 d间断1 d,连续治疗4周;西药组给予口服盐酸洛哌丁胺胶囊2 mg,3次/d,连续治疗4周。两组进行疗效比较,随访6个月后统计复发率。结果：温针灸组总有效率为86.7%（52/60）,西药组总有效率为71.7%（43/60）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;随访6个月后,温针灸组复发率为21.4%（6/28）,西药组复发率为54.5%（12/22）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（...
Saved in:
| Published in | 世界针灸杂志：英文版 no. 4; pp. 43 - 45 |
|---|---|
| Main Author | |
| Format | Journal Article |
| Language | English |
| Published |
2013
|
| Subjects | |
| Online Access | Get full text |
Cover
Loading…
| Summary: | 目的：观察温针灸治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征的临床疗效。方法：120例腹泻型肠易激综合征患者,随机分为温针灸组和西药组,每组各60例。温针灸组主穴取天枢、足三里、三阴交,采用温针灸,留针30 min,每日1次,治疗6 d间断1 d,连续治疗4周;西药组给予口服盐酸洛哌丁胺胶囊2 mg,3次/d,连续治疗4周。两组进行疗效比较,随访6个月后统计复发率。结果：温针灸组总有效率为86.7%（52/60）,西药组总有效率为71.7%（43/60）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）;随访6个月后,温针灸组复发率为21.4%（6/28）,西药组复发率为54.5%（12/22）,两组比较差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论：温针灸治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征具有较好疗效,复发率相对较低。 |
|---|---|
| Bibliography: | diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome; warm needling; recurrencerate GE Juan-juan;ZENG Ke-xue;ZHOU Dong-sheng（1.TCM Hospital of Guangdong Province;2.Second TCM Hospital of Guangdong Province） 11-2892/R Objective To observe the clinical effect of warm needling in the treatment of diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome. Methods One hundred and twenty patients with diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome were randomly divided into a warm needling group and a western medicine group by random digit table method, 60 patients were included in each group. Tiānshū （天枢 ST 25）, Zúsānl （足三里 ST 36） and Sānyīnjiāo （三阴交 SP 6） were selected as the main acupoints for the warm needling group, the needles were retained for 30 min, once a day, an interval of 1 day was set up after treatment for six days, and the treatment were carried out for continuous four weeks. The patients in the western medicine group were orally administered with 2 mg loperamide hydrochloride capsules, 3 times a day, and the treatment were carried out for continuous four weeks. The treatment effects were compared between the two groups, and the recurrence rates were counted after for six-month followup. Results The total effective rate in the warm needling group was 86.7% （52/60） and the total effective rate in the western medicine group was 71.7% （43/60）, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P0.05）; after six-month follow-up, the recurrence rate in the warm needling group was 21.4% （6/28）, while the recurrence rate in the western medicine group was 54.5% （12/22）, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant （P0.05）. Conclusion The warm needling therapy shows relatively satisfactory treatment effects in the treatment of diarrhea irritable bowel syndrome and the recurrence rate is relatively low. |
| ISSN: | 1003-5257 |