Discrimination of Acacia seeds at species and subspecies levels using an image analyzerDiscrimination of Acacia seeds at species and subspecies levels using an image analyzerDiscrimination of Acacia seeds at species and subspecies levels using an image analyzerDiscrimination of Acacia seeds at species and subspecies levels using an image analyzer

Seeds of Acacia species and subspecies were characterized using an image analyzer and discriminatedfor the purpose of identification of species, using their seeds, The species considered in the study were Acacia nilotics subsp, indica, A. nilotica subsp, cupressiformis, A. nilotica subsp, tomentosa,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in中国林学:英文版 no. 4; pp. 253 - 260
Main Author V. SIVAKUMAR R. ANANDALAKSHMI Rekha R. WARRIER B. G. SINGH M. TIGABU B. NAGARAJAN
Format Journal Article
LanguageEnglish
Published 2013
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text

Cover

Loading…
More Information
Summary:Seeds of Acacia species and subspecies were characterized using an image analyzer and discriminatedfor the purpose of identification of species, using their seeds, The species considered in the study were Acacia nilotics subsp, indica, A. nilotica subsp, cupressiformis, A. nilotica subsp, tomentosa, A. tortilis subsp, raddiana, A. tortilis subsp. spirocarpa, A. raddiana, A. senegal, A. auriculiformis, A. farnesiana, A. leucophloea, A. mearnsfi, A. melanoxylon, A. planifrons and A. mangium. Eight samples each consisting of 25 seeds per species were studied using the image analyzer for physical characteristics of seeds, such as 2D surface area, length, width, perimeter, roundness, aspect ratic and fullness ratio. Discriminant analysis showed that acacias can be discriminated at species and subspecies levels, with 96% accuracy. Exceptions were A. nflotica subsp, tomentosa (75.0%), A. tortilis subsp, spirocarpa (75.0%) and A. raddiana (87.5%) which had relatively low discrimination accuracy. However, discriminant analysis within selected species showed complete recognition of these species except for A. tortilis subsp, spirocarpa, that had still a large overlap with A. leucophloea. The study also revealed that both seed size and shape characteristics were responsible for species discrimination. It can be concluded that rapid analysis of seed size and shape characteristics using image analysis techniques can be used as primary and secondary keys for identification of acacias.
Bibliography:11-3919/S
Acacia, image analyzer, discriminant analysis, seed identification
ISSN:1008-1321
1993-0372