眼创伤评分法在军人机械性眼外伤中的临床应用

目的探讨眼创伤评分(OTS)在军人机械性眼外伤视力预后评估中的临床应用,并分析比较军事训练和非军事训练所致眼外伤预后评分的构成差别。方法对633例(665眼,其中军事训练伤326眼,非军事训练伤339眼)军人机械性眼外伤进行OTS评分,比较本研究纳入病例的终视力比率与OTS表推算各级终视力概率的差别,分析评分与终视力的相关性。结果与OTS标准终视力概率表比较,本研究军人机械性眼外伤评分后终视力概率分布在OTS-1级有显著差异(P〈0.01),特别是无光感组比值相对较低(46%vs 73%,P〈0.01),其余分布无显著差异(P〉0.05)。军事训练和非军事训练所致军人眼外伤之间OTS-3级视力...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in解放军医学杂志 Vol. 36; no. 10; pp. 1001 - 1004
Main Author 张颖 张卯年 姜彩辉 刘铁城
Format Journal Article
LanguageChinese
Published 2011
Subjects
Online AccessGet full text
ISSN0577-7402

Cover

More Information
Summary:目的探讨眼创伤评分(OTS)在军人机械性眼外伤视力预后评估中的临床应用,并分析比较军事训练和非军事训练所致眼外伤预后评分的构成差别。方法对633例(665眼,其中军事训练伤326眼,非军事训练伤339眼)军人机械性眼外伤进行OTS评分,比较本研究纳入病例的终视力比率与OTS表推算各级终视力概率的差别,分析评分与终视力的相关性。结果与OTS标准终视力概率表比较,本研究军人机械性眼外伤评分后终视力概率分布在OTS-1级有显著差异(P〈0.01),特别是无光感组比值相对较低(46%vs 73%,P〈0.01),其余分布无显著差异(P〉0.05)。军事训练和非军事训练所致军人眼外伤之间OTS-3级视力分布存在显著差异(P〈0.05);两者均与标准概率在OTS-1级分布有显著差异(P〈0.01),无光感组比率较低(50%vs 73%,P〈0.01;43%vs73%,P〈0.01);非军事训练眼外伤OTS-2级与标准概率分布不同(P〈0.05)。但是,无论军人机械性眼外伤总体、军事训练所致眼外伤还是非军事训练眼外伤终视力分布均与OTS评分等级存在正线性相关趋势(P〈0.0001)。结论 OTS可初步为军人机械性眼外伤提供一个较为可靠的预后信息,尤其对于军事训练所致严重眼外伤的早期确立诊治及转送方案有积极意义。
Bibliography:11-1056/R
eye injuries; ocular trauma score; predictive value
ZHANG Ying,ZHANG Mao-nian,JIANG Cai-hui,LIU Tie-cheng.Department of Ophthalmology,General Hospital of PLA,100853 Beijing,China
Objective To evaluate the predictive value of ocular trauma score(OTS) in mechanical ocular injuries occurring in military forces,and compare the difference of OTS application between ocular injury caused by military training and non-military training.Methods The data of 633 inpatients from armed forces suffering from injury of 665 eyes were retrospectively reviewed.Of the 665 injured eyes,326 were injured during military training and 339 during non-military training.The likelihood of final visual acuity(VA) calculated with the OTS score was compared with that by the present OTS study,and the correlation between the score and final VA was then analyzed.Results Compared with the distribution of final VA in standard OTS score,the ratio in category 1 was statistically different in present study(P0.01),among which the ratio of no-
ISSN:0577-7402